The youtube commentary also contains the talk outline, which the kurzweilai.net link omits.
741 karma · joined April 13, 2009
The youtube commentary also contains the talk outline, which the kurzweilai.net link omits.
- (Flight instructor's mantra): Fly the plane.
- When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
- Measure twice, cut once.
- (Paraphrasing Senator Moynihan): Show me the data. You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.
So I won't be flagging this one.
More seriously, I remember APL\360 SETFUZZ from long before many of you whippersnappers were born, which told the system to disregard so-many bits in an 'equals' evaluation.
FP implementations are generally evil, and errors cascade in irritating fashion. 50% of a numerical analysis class I took once was dedicated to error estimation. Stick to rationals if you can - it'll save your hairline.
Some of the data may be products of military signal gathering, capabilities of which those agencies would be loathe to disclose.
[1] http://www.examiner.com/article/nasa-s-bolden-no-american-le...
[2] http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/story/2012...
Please, please, just tell me: What does your product do?
Seriously, I take your point about the differences between men and women. I saw the news tidbit a few weeks ago about the study on toddlers and the toys they prefer. I'm willing to treat those studies objectively.
Yet in the case I cited, fewer than three percent of attendees at a technical conference were women. "Predispositions to excel" or not, that's a statistic too big to ignore, and there's something else going on.
Look around you: assuming you're in IT, unless you work in a truly remarkable place men considerably outnumber women. We (and I mean the egalitarian "we") have to do something about that.
I'd welcome your suggestion. But "start treating everybody as equals" is a goal, and not very prescriptive. How do we get from point A to point B?
(I upvoted you because your discourse is reasoned and polite.)
The people attending Conj are bright, well-spoken, polite. I didn't meet a jerk in three years, a crowd I was proud to be seen with. But WHERE WERE THE WOMEN? What is going on here?
We must do something. I don't know what. I'll agree with you that exclusionary events are counterproductive, but I can't see the harm in recognizing successful women who can show us how it's done.
Read Marty Caidin's book instead. It's hard to put down, and contains a nice section concerning Jim Pruett's finishing school that makes you want to become a pilot yourself.
It is unlikely that you have an informed opinion of "Clojure people" on the basis of a few posts that give you heartburn.
Kurzweil makes an effective and well reasoned case that it is indeed coming, but his fantastic description of life after uploading is cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
Invasion of the Body Snatchers was more prescient IMO:
Kauffman: Love, desire, ambition, faith - without them, life's so simple, believe me.
Bennell: I don't want any part of it.
Kauffman: You're forgetting something, Miles.
Bennell: What's that?
Kauffman: You have no choice.
I suppose they're well cared for, but I also suppose that it can be lonely in there.
I've postulated this once or twice on HN before: they're there, but they're not looking for us. Civilizations either self-destruct or they reach technological singularity. At that point, why explore the universe at the unbearable crawl of speed C, only to catalog endless permutations of the same old molecules, nothing to learn that you couldn't derive from first principles.
They spend their resources looking in the opposite direction: not outward, but inward. Down there, past ten or 11 dimensions of superstring theory, far beyond today's dimly seen fundament, beneath all those layers of turtles... that's the real frontier. Smaller, not bigger.
I think that alien civilizations just roll up into a ball and disappear from view, exploring the universe within.
OP describes immersing himself in the details of a construction project, yielding to the temptations of total control. Micromanaging that project (atop the demands of family life) was a tremendous time-sink, and he lost focus on the Day Job - leading his company. He became detached, and his management style more autocratic and less consensus-driven.
He should have, he says, delegated or hired out much of the construction project work. Shepherding the company culture is a more important use of his time.
I found his introspective candor refreshing; not everyone is self-assured enough to admit a mistake.