dapids

Is blender not open-source?

Interesting, thanks for the insight.

I was hoping this was a modelling software with solvers for electro/thermo/aero dynamics, etc. What is this solving?

It's also a preferred hardware inspection as its dead easy to rip the header than to seek mid-message to do message entropy/fingerprinting.

I'm not sure it was ever a particularly reliable approach to master instruction timings as these timings are a best effort schedule guarantee outside of a hard real-time system. Unless you profiled each instruction cycle timing over every microcode update to your processor, maybe, but I'm doubtful this was ever a sound approach.

It doesn't sound like grey beard knew what he was actually doing, but more relying on his years of experience and good fortune that has kept him with a job up until then.

Man, you seem to have a lot of hot takes on pizza here with zero evidence. As a Canadian I will take my thin pizza, not everything needs to be "American". Disgusting.

In some countries like Canada you have to pay out unused vacation regardless, its the law.

And that's the way it should be. But many stick it out like their life depends on it, because somehow it usually does, and getting any other job is apparently out of the question. Good on your for deciding enough is enough.

This will be great. As it will allow me to offload code to compute shaders without switching compilers.

What do you think? Kinda a pedantic response for a spelling mistake.

Facebook still owns Facebook.

It literally says 2022

It takes approx. 5 seconds to add a new search engine to Safari on macOS.

What?

Whole page is an ad cesspool

Especially compute shaders. A very nice and concise way of writing prototype GPU bound code without muddling in lower level details.

I too was surprised.

No, but thanks for the link.

Okay, now do it recursively for all supported record types. Oh, wait.

Okay, how about globally? This argument on it's face is useless. Detergent comes in a variety of forms, both liquid and solid.

I guess we are calling paths to executables "bash code" now.

What? Do you have a source for them all taking the same amount of space? Bit of an assumption. For example, many stores in Tokyo are quite compact due to the real-estate cost, so I don't see how this applies generally.

username checks out

What on earth are you talking about? ld64 is a completely different beast than dyld in today's world.

Also, I'm not sure looking for individual points of contact in a large org is the best idea. I emailed security@apple.com. Even if it's not a security bug they will help direct you to the right team.

Again, have you even tried?

Thanks for the response. Mistakes happen, human or computer, not the end of the world, and I get it. I was just more curious to know if there is a manual process for this type of forking that was not being vetted via the bot, and to bring another example to your attention.

I just got a security bug fixed last month in dyld in one release cycle. Didn't strike me as difficult. I emailed them, and they fixed it. Not much more to add then that. Have you actually tried?

Also dyld isn't just some thrown-over the wall code. It's completely designed and built by Apple and is the cornerstone to making the user-space runtime functional.

Literally half the operating system is open source macOS, they have an entire site dedicated to it. opensource.apple.com.

Oh and don't forget googles ridiculous amount of effort poured into Android open-source source tree, just to name one of many.

I honestly can't tell if you are trolling here or not.

It's not just bots, it's real people: https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0...

Do you mind addressing the reason why an employee did exactly what you are claiming the bot did in error?

https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0...

Again, this is a person, not a robot. How does this play into a "software bug"?

As someone who has been trapped in a building during a fire by a pipe wielding maniac. It isn't always that simple.

Because it was done intentionally by an employed individual in this case rather than a bot. You cannot in good conscious as an individual make this "mistake" without knowing or acting maliciously unless you are incompetent to begin with. Seems like a growing trend at MS. And I'll remind you that Apple actually uses CUPS for their print backend and funds it directly, they retain the original license and support the project, meanwhile MS takes it, doesn't contribute and acts like it's their own, sick.

https://github.com/microsoft/cups/commit/8100595a3a3a6d5c7d0...