I suggest you read the work being published by Stanford U and Renee DiResta -- https://twitter.com/noUpside
5,831 karma · joined October 11, 2007
I have a website at http://david.ulevitch.com/
I suggest you read the work being published by Stanford U and Renee DiResta -- https://twitter.com/noUpside
There is absolutely nothing defensible about this move that I can see.
Is there any argument that this is beneficial to anyone except Ethos and Internet Society? Is it even clear they have the right to sell it?
Has every person at ISOC submitted conflict statements? Are they willing to commit to never benefit financially from Ethos controlled entities for 10+ years?
The huge winners take even longer to reach a liquidity point, and this class of investors are very patient.
Imagine you're a startup founder who has a high-flying startup. You own 20%. It just got valued at $800,000,000. Now you're worth $160,000,000 ON PAPER. That's awesome. But it's not the same is being rich.
Imagine your salary is $150,000. With the Warren plan you now owe $2,200,000 PER YEAR in taxes from cash you don't actually have. So you now what, sell your company? Try to secondary? Congrats you just got taxed real money on fantasy paper gains that you never realized.
I believe the current number is ZERO.
Well this is false, and misleading. The connection to Sidefinder is a red herring -- sitefinder was applied Internet-wide, OpenDNS was a choice. Saying OpenDNS redirected www.google.com isn't accurate either. There was a URL that was redirected for a portion of users for a very short period of time because Google installed a hijacked version of the Google toolbar, and once we did this, they reverted their erroneous behavior and we reverted ours and we wrote about it extensively (https://umbrella.cisco.com/blog/2007/05/22/google-turns-the-...).
Geoff knows better, but is being lazy or sloppy while trying to provide a historical record. A shame, because it's a worthwhile topic to go over.
The real conclusion he fails to make is that between Android, Chrome, and Google Search, there is a total monopoly on navigation for the vast majority of the Internet. That's distressing, and until there is a major platform shift, it's hard to see that changing.
"Injects" is a strong word.
Maybe "Hashicorp provides an Azure Partner ID in Terraform deployments for deployment stats, and some users may not want that" would be a better title.
which uses Flare: https://www.2dimensions.com/about-flare
(and is using an Open Source runtime that runs natively)
Here's a nearly identical version that a number of folks use: https://hostifi.net/
It's so hard to always find how all the pieces fit together and this repo has it all. Really impressive.
(I believe this was first said by my partner Marc)
Just because someone has found employment is not much of a signal of how they are doing.
I think you should edit your post and at least remove her name so it’s not indexed. It’s not nice. I would flag it for the mods but don’t see a way to do that.
""" Semi-related, they also found the 737MAX cockpit voice recorder from the downed Lion Air plane. My guess is that this will turn into an indictment of the new anti-stall software. You couldn’t pay me any amount of money to board a 737MAX-8 until that system is improved. """
Someone smart thought this was a good idea.
"This allows you to use first-party cookies and storage to customize content and simplify analytics integration. Your page appears under your URL instead of the google.com/amp URL."
Creating opacity in security and misdirection in trust is unwise for users. Making the address bar lie is dangerous.
I just don't get how the smart people at Google allow this to happen. The developers of Chrome and AMP can try to rationalize bad behavior but I'm surprised how all their coworkers let it stand. There was once a Google that would have been displeased with this kind of action.
So what you are suggesting isn't actually true, and it's hardly hypothetically even possible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
As an aside, I'd love the Twitter engineering teams that fixed the fail whale to one day write about this as it related to fixing Twitter's stability and performance. It seems they simultaneously made major platform shifts and managed to fix things. Maybe it was done in small pieces, piece by piece and perhaps a SOA/Microservices architecture may have enabled that to feel like a rewrite without being one all at once. I'd love to hear the story. My understanding is that in addition to platform shifts, the actual engineering teams cycled out almost completely at least once, too. Really hard changes to manage through.
For instance, some founders will negotiate a grant upon IPO or upon sale of a company beyond $x dollars as a way to try and align interests with investors. The problem with those is that it can cause unnatural behavior (eg, Snapchat IPO'd too soon, I'd argue, because Evan's investors gave him a grant that vested upon a qualified IPO exceeding a certain price. Or the tax issues late-breaking grants can create upon a trigger.)
DNSCrypt (or DNS over TLS or DTLS) is a wonderful alternative that works in-band and works with DNSSEC.
People are also ignoring the consequences of the switch from UDP to TCP.