Candidly, you should never use it for anything other than taking money out of an ATM.
5,831 karma · joined October 11, 2007
I have a website at http://david.ulevitch.com/
Candidly, you should never use it for anything other than taking money out of an ATM.
I would suggest your security team do an audit with CloudLock (note, we acquired them at Cisco) and my guess is that it'll be illuminating / shocking.
No idea how this is on the front page, this is literally years-old news.
We haven't shown ads or done nxdomain redirection for more than two years.
We are, however, probably one of the best and easiest things you can do to raise the bar for user security on the Internet. We're also part of Cisco now[1].
1: https://newsroom.cisco.com/press-release-content?articleId=1...
Smart.
That's not an issue for me at my $corporation because they are sane, but apparently that's the argument.
Thought of course I'd have preferred it stay with DoC under its benevolent and almost entirely hands-off stewardship.
While it happens, there are many projects and efforts that are tightly controlled, managed, and executed.
And when projects go off the rails, people are generally pretty unhappy. The government is huge though, so bad apples and bad actors exist... but it's not accurate to write hyperbolically as you do.
Credit Card fee negotiation results in a benefit or cost to a company. Steak dinner is a benefit to an individual. "Relationship building" activities are important, but should be treated separately and unrelated to contract negotiations and deal terms.
That said, if this is a <$5k amount of legal bill… I might just offer to split it to leave cordially.
What changed to make the perl become capable whereas previously it lacked the low port capability?
Tumblr was failing to execute on the revenue side of their business, both before their acquisition, and then after.
At some point, Tumblr had to try and become a business and not just a website.
This article points blame at Marissa, but shouldn't it really be pointing at David, or a team of leaders?
A lot can be done to turn the ship around in a year. If they don't, the stock grants (depending on issue price) will be worth a lot less than originally issued, and they'll mainly have a highly taxed bonus. The grants are to prevent opportunity cost of leaving from being considered.
If they turn it around, the stock grants will be easily worth it. The company was worth $3b+ weeks ago. Now it's dipped below $1.5b. If they can fix that, that's a small price to pay.
Smart, and super curious how this plays out with teams and comp negotiation, especially vis-a-vis acquihire equity negotiations.
With no investors to return capital or stock to, negotiating as a team should increase returns to the team individuals.
Many of small actions by a small number of focused people in Washington, in the Whitehouse, and entrepreneurs and bankers, may have a profound impact on millions of Cuban lives in a very short period of time.
Another good reminder (to abuse a quote), "chance favors the prepared" -- Stripe had already laid a lot of groundwork before Atlas to handle the systems required for this, and then they launched Atlas to handle many of the regulatory requirements, and so when this opportunity came along for Cuba, they were quickly able to take advantage of it.
As one of the largest recursive DNS infrastructures in the world, they allowed us enough time to spin up resources to determine if we were vulnerable (we were not) which was very much appreciated.
We did a small post this morning that also captures some of the history of our codebase. https://engineering.opendns.com/2016/02/29/a-brief-history-o...