208 karma · joined December 8, 2020
Here's another from 2022 that compares Colgate fluoride toothpaste against BioMin F(https://shorturl.at/M4hiQ).
Wow.... I mean I can measure like anyone, but to make my own pharmaceuticals?.
I love that Ars-Technica calls out BS on the title of the article: "Open source AI is the path forward," says Mark Zuckerberg, misusing the term.
The author Edwards states correctly "...undermining your competitors using a model subsidized by a social media war chest is also an efficient way to play spoiler in a market where you might not always win with the most cutting-edge tech."
Don't know about you, but the data sure tells another story doesn't it? I damn well don't live in CA (midwest), but don't believe anything on the 'net until you verify it yourself. Too many people pushing an agenda.
(*) https://rockinst.org/issue-areas/fiscal-analysis/balance-of-...
I'd throw all our worthless Xerox in the trash if I could still get Oki.
I unsubscribed from his channel the very day I saw that video. As a YT premium subscriber, I'll support creators who have at least some self honesty
For goodness sake, YT isn't close to perfect, but it's leagues ahead of the craptastic TikTok.
Maybe I've just trained myself to phrase questions that return better results on Google than other sites, I don't know.
I do know that I have never, ever gotten a result from DDG that meets or exceeds the same Google search.
If the Roman (pagan) material dared to suggest something different than accepted church teaching, it wasn't copied or preserved.
Hell, that's why the capture of libraries in Spain in the 15th century was still important to the renaissance. Muslim scholars preserved a bunch of Greek and Roman material that had COMPLETELY disappeared during the European dark ages.
A snippet: " Permissions and Restrictions You may access and use the Service as made available to you, as long as you comply with this Agreement and applicable law."
Not a dang thing in there about "free". Now, you can argue whether or not your saw those terms, or agreed to them, but the TOS are legally binding.
Don't like those TOS, fine, makes no difference to me. But calling those videos "free" is not only naive, but wrong.
Because we all know if a company needs to spend 100mill and a year to bring up a new supply source, their stock price will plummet due to analysts negative ratings.
Maybe things have changed; I'd certainly be glad to hear it. But we all know of Wall Street's long history of hatred towards physical inventory.
The brouhaha over it in the non-technical, broad journalistic sites was both generally lazy and biased. I browse a couple dozen 'news' sites each day, and I know my news feed was full of major press sites slamming the game. Wired's review was utterly pathetic (rated 1 out of 10), and several large newspaper organizations were not too far behind in their criticism. Heck, I canceled my sub to Wired just because of that horrific review; I figure if they let that kind of crap slide onto the top of their main page, they've fallen far enough that I don't need to support them anymore.
As far as the Tech press goes, however, they mostly criticized the product for it's lack of optimization, as evidenced by the bench-marking results that were all over the place.
I'll grant that kind of sustained checking is what you need to combat malware on Windows. But it damn well does have an effect on the overall system responsiveness.
() I did a q-n-d check; 1.3M events, and almost 300K were AV/Malware.
Of course others used it too, but the 'news cachet' meant a lot too, and helped convince others to use it too. I could easily see journalists fears helping to keep the ugly bastard going. Glad I never wasted my time on it.
Matrix's code is independently audited, and they just completed the 2nd of those earlier this year. They did have some Cryptographic issue several months ago, but it was fixed quickly, and was on an old code base. The replacement is apparently close to completion, at which point that system will be submitted for an independent cryptographic audit.
I will admit that BlueSky does seem to incorporate the recently announced decentralized identifier (DID) spec from the W3C. The DID Method specs are still a hot mess, and there's no guarantee that the W3C is even capable of navigating that corporate 'I was here first' minefield. But I still have to tip my hat to BlueSky for doing it though. Given identity is so fundamental to these types of things, I suspect it'll be a damn mess incorporating it into existing protocols.