dd_xplore

It maybe robust, but it's very very limited in capability. There's no depth to GUI interactions.

They ran doom on it

Did you not get a manufacturing defect car

Just like this comment indulging in misinformation, citing fraudulent websites with false statistics

Why?

Talk is cheap, send patches

Yahoo company still exists!!

One of the mayor things to hate is that you need to hold down the trackpad to do any stuff

> It is so utterly deranged and insane that NYT says plants are making "mournful cries" when the source paper doesn't support that. When I'm hungry the sounds my stomach makes on its own isn't me weeping and wailing. When I'm flatulent that sound is not a joyful scream.

Nytimes has never been reliable

Future of Ad companies!

Even whatsapp had about 50 members when they were handling billion users

I thought wired is into tech/science

What's the issue? He has faith in something. But he's discussing the science without any religious stuff. Even then he never said anything along the lines that would compare the mechanism with creation of god or something. What's with all the hate?

OpenSSH is used in variety of platforms, enforcing secret key will prohibit it's usage in lot of places due to the added complexity.

Wtf is Hindu manager

Yes, I'm happy cuz I finally got a updated distro. P.S I have a NanoPi R6C.

Joshua makes some good improvement and upstreams for this SOC

https://github.com/Joshua-Riek/ubuntu-rockchip

I could run my 4790K max @4.6GHz with 1.29V

I had a PSP Go, The trick was to crash a certain game by loading a compromised save game file. Wonderful times.

This is why M series chips "feels" faster

I changed data_volume to 8GB and ran on my desktop (Amd Ryzen5 7600X + 2x8GB DDR5-4800 running @ 5000 Mhz)(Win11) I get around 55 GB/s

  PS E:\> .\bandwidth.exe  
  1 54.0  
  2 56.7  
  3 56.1  
  4 55.3  
  5 54.6  
  6 54.3  
  7 53.9  
  8 53.1  
  9 53.4  
  10 53.1  
  11 52.3  
  12 52.8

55 is kinda low for DDR5 I guess..

On S23 Ultra (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2+, 12GB LPDDR5X @4200MHz)

  u0_a339@localhost ~> ./bandwidth
  1 34.4 GB/s
  2 38.7 GB/s
  3 42.0 GB/s
  4 42.3 GB/s
  5 42.4 GB/s
  6 40.2 GB/s
  7 41.0 GB/s
  8 40.3 GB/s

On a NanoPi-R6C (RockChip RK3588s @2.4Ghz + 8GB LPDDR4X)

  pi@nanopi ~> ./bandwidth
  1 22.1 GB/s
  2 26.2 GB/s
  3 27.5 GB/s
  4 27.7 GB/s
  5 27.1 GB/s
  6 27.1 GB/s
  7 27.0 GB/s
  8 26.9 GB/s

so they should just let themselves be killed?

It's hard to believe that it can simulate the billions of neurons carrying out trillions of signals

Don't let the humans know or they'll start reducing their efforts in afforestation.

Yes! Behind all the hype, I was really surprised when Apple launched the M series. I was wondering how such a huge company can remove support for an architecture in such a small span of time(MS's legacy support has ruined us all?)

Haha true that. It's really limited in terms of how well it can be integrated, however I really wish Apple would make some socket version of this(in future )for general consumers or atleast OEMs , it would be hugely successful.

The chances are close to impossible since it's Apple, and the architecture will need lot's of changes or the OEMs will have to change their motherboard design drastically to support a socketed M series chip ( storage controller, memory controller are all on the SOC)

I haven't used 3G/3.5G in over a decade now(almost). Even 90% of our carriers have disabled 3G services , some are 4G/5G only and others support 2G/4G/5G

It's absolutely mind boggling that such a powerful processor can run at a power envelope less than 10 watts!

However most functionalities of the OS are ridiculous. File management is the worst. On Android you could do whatever you want exactly with the particular file, not so much on iOS. iOS despite being smooth and consistent only works the way that apple wants.

C++ still holds it's weight after all these years. Simple and highly performant.