1,773 karma · joined July 22, 2012
Why don't members of congress lead by example and delete their accounts/memberships with these social media companies? And stop spending their campaign money on social media. Boycott them, as individuals.
Then stop these companies from stalking everyone around the Internet by passing legislation to call it as such. Pass real privacy legislation.
Go after their advertising business model with anti-trust. Prevent tech monopolies from continuing to acquire and conglomerate.
Censorship becomes an unwinnable game of whack-a-mole without addressing the root causes.
I hope we don't exhaust ourselves to keep up.
They'll do what's profitable over what's accurate.
Users are more like the soil of the product. Google is the farmer harvesting data that grows from it and profits from it.
Our new tragedy of the commons.
MSM, including Facebook and Twitter, empowered this monster and profited from it. This joke of a candidate was propped up and put front and centre instead of being ignored. They fed the Troll and moments before he turns to stone, they take credit for cutting him off.
The final straw for me was in 2016 when he was nominated. I deleted all social media and actively avoided US news--even then I'd hear conversations about it everywhere--even outside of the US.
Good luck America, you'll need it.
1) Spending more time with people I love.
2) Traveling.
3) Low-impact hobby farming and forestry with horses.
4) Learning to do new things.
5) Connecting with new people in my community. Volunteering.
Start by shaming government officials and organizations, any official government channels, even schools and school boards, that require tools provided by surveillance capitalists. If a ToS and privacy policy to a third party is required, then your right to freedom of association is infringed upon.
If governments make official releases only to walled gardens, then those who choose not to associate are cut-off from important information in the political process.
Giving up your equal rights unless you give in to surveillance capitalism is a threat to democracy.
Start there.
I almost wish there were less precise and more obscure options out there today. A search engine that purposefully didn't index mainstream news, social media, nor shopping/product sites.
As a teenager who didn't know any better, it was empowering to gain that level of access to a computer, to realize a certain level of control over it that was previously abstracted away. It felt like some insider knowledge that I was becoming aware of.
Reason: command line simplicity
There's an expectation from the publishing/serving side of the equation that the content is being served to a proprietary app or a web browser that works a particular way. With the browser being one of Chrome, Firefox, etc., along with Google's YouTube apps.
On the user side, especially those who understand how the content is served, that the browser is not the only abstraction allowed. Google themselves run bots to scour the internet employing all sorts of tricks to access and index content. There's a fundamental way in which the http protocol works and its content served that is client agnostic. Everyone, Google Search most of all, have benefitted from this.
Making tools other than browsers illegal will fundamentally break the internet in my opinion.
What gets lost or missed is the underlying intent of the protocols and tools being used to share content. An http server serves files independent of the client/user-agent–that's how the web works. If a work is published this way then that's the expectation. If YouTube and the RIAA want it to work another way, then use a different protocol/medium and put the content behind a login and limit access.
I'm not saying people should be free then to republish/share copyrighted works. Just that we are free to use tools to retrieve files that have been served openly via the web.
I thought Quebec had pushed this high voltage technology in the 1960s. (I can't find the source on this at the moment...)
Buckminster Fuller also popularized the idea of an integrated world electric grid in the 1970s and in his book "Critical Path".
Linux and BSDs have gotten significantly better and with better hardware support.
In general, if I had a choice between today's software and the software of 15 years ago, running on today's hardware, I'd choose the software of 15 years ago in a heartbeat.
I'd suggest respecting Google's robots.txt as much as Google respects our DNT settings.
Milling large trees down to 2x4s and coupling it to drywall to build homes that don't last is a travesty.
Technology can be a rollercoaster ride of benefit and detriment.