275 karma · joined February 20, 2018
1e55374ec2e12f06e986d24cef1e9fed8131e37ea02f0b7531ee1c191f7d3bea
A greater share of the HN readership was already having a quarantine friendly work/lifestyle, than the general population. Due to underlying macro-trends (technology, mobile consumer internet, entrepreneurship...).
And one of these macro-trends, the fragility of our hyper-reactive interconnected world, was illuminated by the covid crisis. I will try to reach you on twitter, to not pollute this thread further.
While we are living in an era where what you consider actual standard are not uniformely regarded as such on the surface of the globe.
I am genuinely interested in knowing how you could arrive at such an opinion ? ( regarding They were not culture where this was considered "good" and these interpersonal competite issues were considered ethical issues by them. )
Side topic, I remember a HN post about a checklist for launching a project. If someone remember it, I would love find retrieve the link.
EDIT: It should work now !
The reasoning behind it is twofold: - They are people who (due to their through their startups, side-projects, thesis, hobbies,...) are familiar with interesting datasets. - With a tool that allow them to spot places on Hacker news where data are discussed, they will be incentivized to contribute and experience less friction.
I hope it increases the frequency of arguments linked to data and give more visibility to projects working with interesting datasets.
I am also looking for people who have projects, however small, where they see interesting data. It is for an ongoing interview serie.[1]
Football is "unstable" as a game. To dominate in a consistent way, you actually need to be overwhelming superior to your opponent in many different stages/aspects of the game. Any weak link and you are at the mercy of fate.
And here is an interview of the founder about his experience building the service and data infrastructure behind it http://datapeek.org/interview/alfadata
Over the years spent reading HN, I noticed that some comments with the best information ratio, were the ones based on data. I wanted a way to quickly find them, otherwise I would miss them.
Surprisingly, reading that feed has started to be part of my daily routine. But I am still toying with features I have in mind. Feedback would be appreciated !
I have turned HN into a personal data-oriented wikipedia and I want to test consuming the resulting feed through audio (like a npr for data-based facts) [0].
If some of you would like to take part into the experiment, leave a comment below !
"First, a strict spatial partitioning: the closing of the town and its outlying districts, a prohibition to leave the town on pain of death, the killing of all stray animals; the division of the town into distinct quarters, each governed by an intendant. Each street is placed under the authority of a syndic, who keeps it under surveillance; if he leaves the street, he will be condemned to death."
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopower
[1]https://foucault.info/documents/foucault.disciplineAndPunish...
-The most important quality to succeeds is the ability to perform in high stakes, inter-personal, coopetitive, status-seeking, small world games (politics).
-One of the most powerful tools to achieve results for an individual (and for a group ) is through the mastering of abstractions.
Puzzle:
-There seems to be a negative correlation between the willingness to engage in political games and the willingness to engage with abstractions despite the advantages both procure. (see the "Nerds" essay by Paul Graham [0]).
Funny hypothesis:
-Politics is the most dynamic, reflexive games there is. Abstraction handling requires (whether consciously or not ) to substract oneself from the world. Those two activities tend to exclude each other, or to consume a lot of energy when both running at full speed. ( they are polar opposite in 2x2 quadrant of [static,dynamic]x[contemplative,reflexive] )
-The silver linings is so much value can be created from mastering abstractions, that a small change in the conditions of the political field (by improving one's attention to it, or by limiting artificially the field like in a elite school) is enough to tip the balance.
----