542 karma · joined July 31, 2017
The Stateless article is a good book report. One nice phrase from it: "Thus while a judge may form his own principles, his customers will decide his competence as a judge."
One error to be aware of is in the following paragraph. Successful plaintiffs are not free to resort to self-help to enforce payments. Self-help, as I understand it through van Notten, is a last ditch measure when no justice is agreeable. Successful rulings are enforced by an individual's own jilib, according to van Notten.
Minor counter-point: I'm not sure if libertarianism is the goal of Somalians. A certain degree of liberty -- a significant say in how they conduct their own lives and not having a government telling them what not to do as much as we are used to -- but I think they also see the value of a court to temper individual liberty in certain cases.
A couple differences between their system and ours: the point where individual rights and social limitations meet is found where another individual suffers some grievance -- some of which, however, appear to be cultural and not material, although I'm not sure how small this segment is. Also, they seem to have some say in their courts, who administers justice for them, and how its administered.
Is there any other basis for seeking peace ever? I think van Notten means here that this is the reason peace is usually sought, because violence is horrifying to those people as well. In North America we also hold violence as the reason to respect social order.
What are the main points about 'the nature and function of law in human societies, particularly in the developed world' you had in mind?
What is the temperature, though?
Scale of 1-10, how much did you trust them before the ban, and how much currently?
You might want to try submitting a post, though, that has examples of nicely published/formatted/printed/bound books.
- oh, I can't delete it. Mods, if you see this message please delete.
You may be speaking as someone techy. For most people, what I said still holds true.
If I want, for any reason, to not use Amazon, I can do that easily (even if I will have to pay more, it is my choice) by typing any other online store or seller into my browser, or going to a local store.
For the typical person, they cannot use anything other than Microsoft if they want to use a computer, period. Except Mac, which many can't afford and which is limiting in what programs it can run.
Assuming a reader has a usable idea(s) - a best-case scenario but the only one worth providing information for - what would you like them to do to present it, how can they feel safe doing so, and what happens after they do and you like it.
(- the author)
(- the author)
I will be putting in more internal hyperlinks as I have more pages on the website to link to. Most of the articles there are still in progress, and this one is a sort of introduction to the HN community (which is my main source of news and analysis these days).
Please link me to your ham radio site when you get it ready for us. I'm also building a list of these types of blogs/sites.
(- the author)
I agree with you on the value of reddit and platforms (and I actually value Facebook-type platforms as well, with the obvious qualifications), but the old html sites I write about here have a different type of construction, material, and value.
(- The author)
PBS did a good report on this development: Sinclair Media is the biggest owner of local TV news (reaches over a third of homes across the nation), and are working towards a merger to control a bigger share yet. However, they are pushing out certain talking points (and other things that have been criticized) across all these stations (these are illustrated in the PBS report).