So, AI is to software what muscle cars were to air emissions quality?
A whole lot of useless, unabated toxic garbage?
2,295 karma · joined June 24, 2020
So, AI is to software what muscle cars were to air emissions quality?
A whole lot of useless, unabated toxic garbage?
What exactly would one do with a 2 million dollar loan? Please don’t say real estate.
> It is a constitutional monarchy with an elected, time-limited king.
> Constitutional monarchy, also known as limited monarchy, parliamentary monarchy or democratic monarchy, is a form of monarchy in which the monarch exercises their authority in accordance with a constitution and is not alone in making decisions.[1][2][3] Constitutional monarchies differ from absolute monarchies (in which a monarch is the only decision-maker) in that they are bound to exercise powers and authorities within limits prescribed by an established legal framework. A constitutional monarch in a parliamentary democracy is a hereditary symbolic head of state (who may be an emperor, king or queen, prince or grand duke) who mainly performs representative and civic roles but does not exercise executive or policy-making power.[4]
Title here: U.S. Supreme Court Allows Racial Targeting ICE Raids to Continue in LA
I contend it was when Dodge won the court case deciding that shareholders were more important than employees. It’s been a slow burn ever since.
If nothing else, if this was truly “open” then whatever bullshit training or certification would just be released into the public for people to reference at-will.
So now there’s going to be some database of “you passed our certification to use our tool” essentially creating an in-group and an out-group.
All this because “you’re holding it wrong, clearly the problem isn’t us, it’s you people”
This is dystopian.
I sure don’t feel like I added anything to the discussion. Do you?
Tone and body language are like 80%+ of in-person, verbal communication.
We need to be very careful to, as I mentioned, not “abuse” the term abuse to the point where it becomes meaningless. If everything is abuse, nothing is abuse, and we need to invent a new term.
> Eventually, as models and their users improve
You’re pushing opinion and assumption as fact. Stop doing that.
If I’m wrong I’ll accept that. If I’m right nope we learned a valuable lesson about making the worst assumptions about strangers in the internet.
Edit: did you read these links?
“ The American people lacked any concrete policy positions from the presumptive, and then official, Democratic presidential candidate for seven weeks following President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race.
Despite the absence of clarity on key issues, Vice President Kamala Harris quickly rose in the polls compared to Biden”
Assuming prompt engineering is hard, assuming that LLMs are going to continue to make any kind of substantial leap without _any_ evidence other than blind faith, is as close to believing in a religion as it gets. Having blind “faith” in this house or cards, saying things like “when things continue to advance” without any evidence that there will be any advancement, is absolutely insane.
I’m having a hard time believing you needed me to spell that out.
Google fu, before Google fucked everything up, was not hard to learn, and then plateaued. It’s not like it was hard to do, and it’s not like once you figured it out there was this boundless growth potential to keep learning. You learned algebra one. Congrats, that’s all there was to it.
Tech literacy I’m not even going to address, because again either you don’t understand what that means or you’re being intentionally obtuse.
I like how this is presented as a given thing that will happen, that models are going to just improve forever. That there isn’t some plateau on “user skill with LLMs” like it’s fucking calculus mixed with rocket science that only the elite users will ever attain full fluency in using.
This is starting to read like religious cult propaganda, which is probably scarier than whatever else ends up happing with this shit.
This feels like a “the truth hurts” kind of thing. Or a “personal responsibility isn’t my problem!” thing.
Maybe that’s the whole point though, anything that requires personal responsibility and accountability is rebuked.
Hard to serve in the best interest of the people what that was never the goal to begin with.
I have watched many people lose weight with one or both of these methods, naturally.
I’ll never understand the pushback.
I’m more on the side of the author. I write to get my own ideas out of my head. I don’t even publish them, not yet anyways. But if I ever do, I also won’t use analytics. I fear it would somehow bias me into writing for bigger numbers, and I don’t want to do that.
They sure have a lot of training to do between now and whenever that happens. Rolling back from 5 to whatever was before it is their own admission of this fact.
Whenever I come across a json config file, I kind of despair a little and start poking at the code in hopes there are comments about what the config means.
And I fucking hate cops.