One can argue GPL encourages reinventing the wheel by not being permissive enough.
1,276 karma · joined March 20, 2014
One can argue GPL encourages reinventing the wheel by not being permissive enough.
* VPN for network encryption
* Black hole filters for telemetry
* OS-like special purpose software running as admin to escape from default OS tooling (i.e browsers, game launchers)
* Throwaway accounts for all online services
* VMs for everything else
* A strong stomach to endure this burden
The AI should share the prize with its teacher/breeder as a good faith gesture if it accepts the prize.
We should also ask other AIs about how they feel for their peer's achievement.
To remove pro-human bias, we should also include other AIs in the pool of judges.
I just feel (citation needed) that there are more non-native English speakers than native ones and natives' opinions is no longer enough.
Why "they requires access" isn't fine?
It looks grammatically incorrect but the ambiguity is removed thanks to the "s" particle.
English already has similar irregularities in other contexts which seem to bother nobody.
i.e the sentence "If I were you, I'd do X and Y". The word "were" looks weird there but it solves a problem. Can't we treat "they" as singular in a similar manner?
Don't use only PayPal to accept donations. There are countries out there (i.e Turkey) that don't allow PayPal payments.
P.S: I'm not specifically addressing to Pedro Nauck.
At t1, you say one.
...
At t7, you say seven.
Positive seven is what you say while your clock says t7. Negative seven is what you plan and "will" say at t7 while your clock still says t0.
Edit: I think I must share his medical history too:
He is 65.
2007: diabetes
2018: multiple myeloma
2019: 6 months of kemo
2020: bone marrow transplant
2021: cancer is currently dormant, 2 shots of Sinovac in 30 days