dieortin

I don’t see how IMAP would prevent you from having old emails

The devices you personally own also do not say anything about Matter itself.

You need to involve Google if you want to test your own Matter device on Android, which is an OS made by Google. How does that say anything about Matter itself?

Are you seriously using some footnote about Android as proof that Google somehow has any control over Matter?

It’s not acceptable for any LED bulb, let alone one as expensive as Philips HUEs are, to die so soon.

> My point is that you wouldn’t expect any one of them to be so much better than the others at crawling that it would give them an advantage

And why not?

I don’t think using a diesel engine would make the fuel efficiency losses from having bad aerodynamics any better

> there is just going to be a lot of data generative stuff in space in the future

Why?

Why use C++ at that point? Also, pre declaring classes instead of including the corresponding headers has quite a few drawbacks.

AFAIK you can very easily get an API key from AI studio without creating any cloud project

Assuming your numbers are correct, you’re ignoring all the rest of the infra

So you think that not knowing how to operate a debugger will exempt your code from having bugs, or you from having to debug them?

It’s very obvious this account was just created to promote your product…

> When we did build payment enforcement, I think we only set it on for Spain and maybe the US.

Can I ask why Spain specifically?

This is explained in the link you’re commenting on.

So you need to write a test for every single possible case to consider your code tested?

Why would fast acceleration and deceleration be more efficient? When you drive an electric car it’s usually the opposite: fast acceleration drains the battery fast, and slow deceleration allows for better regenerative braking without having to use the actual brakes.

> I’m fine with regular old fashioned search engines

> I now instruct chatgpt to search the web for me and I read the result

I wouldn’t exactly classify ChatGPT as an old fashioned search engine

> $3,00015

That’s a very weird place to put a comma. I have no idea what number this is representing (since I doubt it’s $3 a month)

https://firebase.studio comes to mind

You’re surprised by that, yet you do the same with Russian official statements, which have an even worse track record?

Quite a few things. For a C++ only project, the biggest ones would be reproducibility and speed. But beyond those, I find it saner overall: the language is way easier to understand (~python), and the model of packages, targets, visibility etc makes it easy to organize and manage a large codebase.

The worst part about Bazel for C++ is that it’s not yet as widespread as CMake or plain old Makefiles so it can be harder to get third party libraries into your project, but that’s changing quite fast with the bazel registry, and you have things like rules_cc that help you run other build systems inside bazel.

They’re too ridiculous… unless a more optimal solution does not exist

I really recommend Bazel (https://bazel.build)

They didn’t drop any ammo, the drones themselves exploded on top of the wings, making the plane catch fire. So if there were tires (I didn’t see any) they didn’t do much to protect the planes.

Also, I don’t know why you would consider the reports in russian media. There’s more than 4 planes being destroyed on video.

Apple doesn’t show green (or any) bubbles for WhatsApp users because WhatsApp is not interoperable with SMS or iMessage

Grok is from xAI, a company he separately funded. It wasn’t part of the acquisition of Twitter.

All your content threads from the past months consist on you saying how much better OpenAI products are than the competition, so that doesn’t inspire a ton of trust.

Is there a difference from what Google is doing here and what other players (OpenAI, Perplexity, Phind…) are doing?

Pretty sure Google has used Docs internally since long before COVID.