Really, no one?
TLDR: Android "custom rom" turns into debian when plugged into a monitor. Has been around since at least 2016.
3,784 karma · joined August 14, 2017
Really, no one?
TLDR: Android "custom rom" turns into debian when plugged into a monitor. Has been around since at least 2016.
As explained in other threads, McKinsey made almost the same amount of profit (adjusted for inflation) as the fine. So the message is:
- the effective fine (profit minus fine) is approximately 0, if you get caught.
- if you don't get caught, you get a profit of 120M.
Not the question. It was "if the company already offers a less ads for money service" then should "less" mean "zero"?
> People still subscribe to newspaper even though they are full of ads.
Is this supposed to prove anything? They don't have a choice. If they offered
a) Lots of ads for $X
b) Many ads for $Y
c) No ads for $Z
How do you see that working out? I would expect (a) and (c) to be massively more popular than (b).
> reflected image from a projector screen is gentler on the eyes than a projected one from a computer monitor
If true, that is a very strong reason. However, it strikes me as a [citation needed] or questionable extrapolation from indirect/diffuse room lighting or bias lighting.
I think it is misleading to call that scenario UBI and that the rest of your post also shares barely any resemblance to actual UBI plans, goals or side effects.
A bad teacher instead gives you a bimodal distribution and just doesn't bother teaching those students.
Hm? That is exactly why UBI works, no? As the name indicates, the bare minimum is taken care so that you can work towards "the best life possible for our loved ones" without worrying about starving, sickness or homelessness.
In contrast, if you were wrong and people would be content with the bare minimum, then UBI would be a bad idea. Though then they could just commit some felonies and be content with having a cell, bread and water for the rest of their lives, no?
In other words: Some students flourish despite their teachers, some flourish because of them.
This gives you vicious and virtuous cycles: Students' learning speed increases with time and past success. So "talented" students learn quickly and have extra time to further explore and improve, leading to further success. Students who struggle with the time constraint are forced to take shortcuts like memorizing "magic formulas" without having time to really understand. Trying to close that gap is very hard work.
Start with the Sherman act and then see that "what antitrust means" has had a long, changing history. By the way, the European understanding of antitrust still includes harm to competition as well, which often pops up on HN (e.g. how does Facebook's action harm consumers? That was not the question!).
Yet, you have lots of people in this thread claim that we have always been at war with Eastasia.
But pretty much yes. Chrome is a very large, very expensive product to develop with very unclear profit perspective once disassociated from Google.
So instead of "10x" substitute "by a large enough factor or margin to make a significant difference". That is totally true globally speaking. Locally, in the US, you could however argue that apple abuses it's iPhone market share to sabotage competition (e.g. streaming, webstandards,etc). That just means you should sue both not neither.
So modest proposal: Make these websites pay 575€ million/year for wasting citizens' time or have them accept that "no" means "no".
It is just using docker to run the VM software (qemu with kvm) and runs macOS in that VM.
It is conveniently packaged up, but the title is very, very misleading.
For example
https://www.gog.com/de/game/baldurs_gate_2_enhanced_edition
Also works quite well with
For 4000€ with just 64GB of RAM instead of 96GB and the same 4TB of storage. So, sure it might be "significantly better" but at 3 times the price that is the bare minimum.
Side question: Lots of mini pcs accept usb-c PD input, i.e. your external PSU can be any laptop charger. Does the mac mini support that?
Completely wrong. Hint: You are on HN. Startups obviously don't start at a large market cap.
For cat vs pumpkin they will think you are making fun of them, but it very much is explainable. Though now I am picturing a puzzle about finding orange cats in a picture of a pumpkin field.
Simplest example: OCR. A network identifying digits can often be explained as recognizing lines, curves, numbers of segments etc.. That is an explanation, not "computer says it looks like an 8"
I remember an interview at a large evangelical event about how they could vote for the decidedly un-Christian liar, fraudster, etc.. Their answer was that a "deal with the devil" is okay as long he delivers on supreme court justices. That was their literal phrasing.
Or in meme form:
Optimism is good, blind optimism isn't.
Will that break the display like it did for tape over the webcam?