I still don't see where HF is explained?
588 karma · joined September 12, 2023
The fact that they're still around doesn't really say anything about the current culture (but the lack of new ones does, somewhat).
(Last line on page 5: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-530A1.pdf )
The lack of any proof-reading seems pretty emblematic of the thought process of this "threat".
“Tramways” are a specific type of road dedicated for trams, separated by dividers. “Tram lanes” are regular roads with tracks that are for exclusive use by trams, usually for part of the day and shared with cars for the rest.
The majority of the tram network is on roads shared with regular vehicle traffic (ie. neither a tramway nor a tram lane).
When trams are moving on shared roads they have no right of way special to them EXCEPT at roundabouts.
(I also know a PTV tram operator who lost their job for rear ending a car that suddenly stopped to turn right)
> If I have to slam the brakes on to avoid hitting a pedestrian
In that case you will not be at fault.
> in lane dedicated ONLY for trams and buses where trams have priority anyway
I’m not sure about Swedish road rules, but I don’t see any note about it being a dedicated lane
You already found the answer.
To me, all of ()[]{} (and depending on context <>) are “brackets” in the sense that they bracket whatever is between them. Then a brace is a single side of a bracket (ie. opening brace plus closing brace make a bracket).
So to distinguish between the different brackets/braces you use “round”, “square”, “curly” or “angled” respectively. And “round” is the default so you often skip specifying that.
That’s been the convention in programming and maths everywhere I’ve worked outside America (in English).
> Jarczak’s code shows that his fork of OrcaSlicer identifies itself as “BambuStudio,” but mostly just by saying that out loud and hoping Bambu’s systems don’t ask any questions. Image: Bambu
is the “security gap” claimed by Bambu
It set a HTTP user agent string...
Precision is orthogonal to the unit.
Why does the absolute number matter? Every trades truck/stockpile will need to stock double for some time, not some absolute value increase.
Why are you conflating speed and precision? A cup-ish measure would be 200g and no one is measuring that to .05% accuracy.
On the flip side, good luck getting .1g precision out of a measuring cup if you need it.
That’s true of everywhere in the world at the time they made the switch (give or take a decade). Why is that a problem unique to America?
That's my point. Iran did, and it did not work out for them so why would they try again?
> Polling of Iranians citizens show 69% of people
67% of people believe Trump is doing a bad job; 56% believe the US shouldn't be in this war; 63% believe the US should stop supporting Israel. They're all roughly the same % as your quote, does that mean the US should change foreign policy?
> Iran's situation was entirely avoidable
Sure, by not dropping bombs on them while negotiation with them?
Those are patch notes (page 7 onwards). The text ends on page 6 with the same font the whole way through.
That's a bad excuse
a) because Europe isn't one single demographic but still public transport is useful, reliable and safe everywhere (from Dublin/Zurich on the low side of the population density scale to London/Paris/Madrid on the high side and Amsterdam/Hamburg/Prague in the middle).
and b) there are plenty of examples outside of Europe. Melbourne is urban sprawl. The metro area is 50 miles east to west, 30 miles north to south (more, but there's also a big bay) and a population of only 5 million. A lower population density than the Denver MSA but manages to run a train/bus/tram system that's useful, reliable and safe.
Did you notice that the 2,500 mile flight earned/generated/conjured 2,500 miles?
(I know, I know, things can change the number you get...)
> https://owasp.org/www-community/pages/attacks/ip_spoofing_vi...
Isn't an actual technique, it's describing the observed result if the server were to blindly trust some HTTP headers which is just the application payload in a TCP stream. It's not spoofing the IP at any network layer.
> https://github.com/ParsaKSH/spoof-tunnel
Requires mutually agreed spoofing on both sides... at which point it's not really spoofing and also clearly not applicable because Wikipedia will not agree to it. (It is useful in the context that they're using it, just not at all what you're talking about)
Without controling a router that's on the path or being able to publish a route that contains the IP address you're trying to spoof, there is no way to spoof an IP address in bidirectional communication.
It’ll also usually be branded “priority” or “premium” with the dominant airline for that airport/terminal (eg. Sky Priority or Premier Access).
Large airports like SFO, DEN and LAX have all combinations of CLEAR/PreCheck/Premium. Smaller ones only have some (ie. premium line doesn’t have precheck or clear).
The only airport I’ve been to recently that I don’t recall having a line like that was Bozeman.
Terminal 3 definitely has a United “Premier Access”/Star Alliance Gold line.
Early Cloudflare days I moved all the infrastructure I was responsible for over to them for being so developer friendly. Now they are both developer unfriendly (eg. horror stories around pricing and plan swaps) and consumer unfriendly with way more frequent intersitals than I remember from ~5 years ago.
I think every time I log in to GitLab I get a Cloudflare check. Doesn’t matter if I’m on a residential connection, starbucks, airport or VPN.