388 karma · joined December 22, 2009
It's all a bit moot though as before this happened, McAfee was probably worse than anything a PC can get infected with. Now it's gone and proved it beyond any doubt.
Imagine if they had to fight for operating system dominance.
Every model created for this is, for all intent and purpose, a piece of rock.
Although I'm pretty sure point sprites and voxels are two different things.
I do hope so, there's a man 2 streets away from me, masturbating into the camera.
For the record, it seems that the UK is a world leader in this regard.
I doubt they'd have anything anywhere near ZBrush's flexibility and depth.
However, I'm certainly willing to attempt to do battle with the uncanny valley if they let me.
I'm not sold yet, it's making some incredibly bold claims. I'm aware of point cloud data models from back when it was included in the 3D Mark '01 benchmark (the rotating horse statue, the test was called point sprites http://www.ixbt.com/video/images/3dmark2001/gf3-sprites.jpg ), and found it an oddity at the time, not all that visually appealing and certainly not as a believable modelling method. It's not raytracing, although it does bare a lot of similarities.
I'll be keeping a sceptical eye and an open mind on this one.
Anyway, here's their website http://unlimiteddetailtechnology.com/
Edit: Thinking about it, it's biggest downfall will occur when physics are involved. For a static scene it's ideal, but to get the branches of the trees to blow in the wind, or to achieve any kind of real time environmental change beyond lighting would likely cause some serious difficulties.
Unless you're involved somehow, that is.