HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

distcs

1,691 karma · joined October 10, 2022

submissionscomments
distcs··on Bye, Gemini
You can still connect to Gopher server using "proper" Gopher clients, so the parent commenter is still right that Gopher is not going away. But then Gemini too is not going away. These niche protocols will always have their niche communities using their niche clients so they are probably going to survive even if they remain obscure.
distcs··on x86 is dead, long live x86
> Single thread performance blow my mind with scores like 4000.

What exactly is this number 4000? What does it mean? Where can I read more about this scoring system?

distcs··on LaTeX3: Programming in LaTeX with Ease (2020)
LaTeX is a de-facto standard in academia and journals. Makes it very hard to just skip and go to Typst or any of the other recent takes on math typesetting.
distcs··on It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
Maybe I'm missing something. What about the site is giving CGA vibes?
distcs··on Mark Watson's Lisp books
I have learnt a great deal about modern state of Lisp from comments written by Mark and others like pjmlp on HN. By reading their comments I've learnt that Lisp is relevant in non-Lisp languages too. So many programming languages borrow concepts that were explored in Lisp languages. And not just Lisp. ML too. Their comments helped me learn this kind of background.

If I could get a directory of active Lisp devs who comment on HN that would be great! Maybe even create a feed out of their comments. Is there any feed of any kind on HN? Even a basic RSS feed could be useful. I could pull the whole feed and filter them out for their comments.

distcs··on Trying to find some life on the Usenet (2020)
I scrolled through all of it and it still ends at alt.* which is a minuscule fraction of all of usenet. Where is the rest?
distcs··on Zenbleed
Why do comments like this just make a bold claim and then wander off as if the claim stands for itself? No explanation. No insight. I mean why should we just take your word for it?

I'd like to be educated here why a big switch statement wouldn't necessarily protect us from these CPU vulnerabilities? Anyone willing to help?

distcs··on The “three things” exercise for getting things out of talks (2011)
This was good. Short and sweet. I might start applying this 3-thing rule in meetings I attend. It'll be nice to have 3-point summaries of every meeting I attend.
distcs··on Ask HN: Dang, could the login page get a title?
> This would be immediately useful for password managers matching on window titles.

Password managers matching on window titles to decide what password to autofill sounds very dangerous! What password manager is this?

distcs··on Ask HN: Mastodon instances run by non-profit foundations (not individuals)?
Wow! Had no idea mastodon.social/online are non-profit. So all these days I was avoiding mastodon.social/online because people have been telling me that they are too big to fail and anything that is too big to fail can make hostile decisions to its users anytime. But I feel better about them knowing they are non-profit.
distcs··on Netscape and Sun announce JavaScript (1995)
I never understood these books. Who reads a 1000 page book to learn a programming language? I bought this particular book some 10 years ago hoping to "master" javascript. The book was so dull that I could not even get to the 3rd chapter. There are books about much more complex subjects that wrap up in < 400 pages. What's really the market of these doorstop books?
distcs··on Local async executors and why they should be the default
If anyone is confused what the "bad editorializing" is ...

Actual title of article: Local Async Executors and Why They Should be the Default

The title posted to HN: Async rust – are we doing it all wrong?

The title has been fixed now. But yeah it is annoying to see badly editorialized titles. It is against the guidelines -- https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.

distcs··on Local async executors and why they should be the default
Agreed. Perhaps we can have a syntax to declare what is editorialized. We already add "(YEAR)" and "[pdf]" and "[video]". We could "[Rust]" or other keywords like that about the post missing from the title?
distcs··on Local async executors and why they should be the default
Can a mod fix the title please? The poster of this story has editorialized the title so bad that it has no connection with the actual title.

Actual title: Local Async Executors and Why They Should be the Default

Posted title: Async rust – are we doing it all wrong?

Really? Why this kind of terrible editorializing?

distcs··on How to write a great README
Since we are on this topic allow me to do an Ask HN comment here.

Ask HN: What are some good Readmes you have found?

distcs··on Minify and Gzip (2022)
> For example, suppose an engineer who is paid $200k per year can spend a week to implement an optimization that reduces costs by 0.1%. If that is 0.1% of something that costs $50 million per year, then that's not a bad use of time.

Is it not? I don't know. I don't run a multi-million dollar business. So this is an honest question. 0.1% of $50 million is a meagre $50000. If someone is running a business that is spending $50 million per year on something, are they really going to care about a small $50k saving per year?

distcs··on Minify and Gzip (2022)
> At the scale of Wikipedia (~10 billion pageviews a month), even a single byte saving can mean terabytes worth of bandwidth saved.

But does it really move the needle anywhere where it matters? If you are serving a million bytes in every response but you manage to trim a single byte from it, I don't think it is going to move the needle anywhere.

Sure it will save a terabyte when you have served a trillion responses. But in a trillion responses you are saving only one terabyte out of an exabyte of responses. That's not much!

distcs··on LazyVim
I still don't understand how these mappings are good.

What if you need to type "fd" in insert mode? Like fd0, fd1, etc. Isn't that going to be a pain? Do you never have to type "fd"?

distcs··on LazyVim
Ctrl+C and Esc do not behave the same in all contexts. The correct replacement for Esc is Ctrl+[.

What if you need to type `jj`? Not uncommon to do so while writing math or physics papers. a_{jj}

distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
Anyone trying to find where the longer comment is, it's here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36735833
distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
#lobsters on Libera.Chat IRC

https://lobste.rs/chat

distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
I don't know the specifics but looks very much like collateral damage. Sorry if that's the case. Looks like her whole invite tree became suspect and the mod removed her whole invite tree. Not justifying what they did but seems like a mistake. Talking to the mod should resolve it.
distcs··on Why software projects take longer than you think: a statistical model (2019)
> The reason planning poker exists is to create a sort of prisoner’s dilemma between developers to stop this getting out of hand.

Planning poker creating a sort of prisoner's dilemma is an intriguing thought. Mind explaining a little how it leads to something like prisoner's dilemma. I'd like to grok the connection between the two things.

distcs··on Why software projects take longer than you think: a statistical model (2019)
> All this smokes and mirrors, when the reality is: if you gave accurate estimates, you'd get reprimanded, not get the project approved, etc.

Depends on the workplace I guess. Haven't seen this where I've worked. quite the opposite. Some managers I've worked with taught me to multiple estimates by 2X before writing it on paper.

distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
I'm no fan of Lobsters. So I've no skin in the game. But it is one thing to say that those people you wrote about in your comment were banned for spamming and it is a totally different thing to say that they were banned for sockpuppetting (when they were not). The former is correct representation of what's there in the mod logs. The latter is a blatant misrepresentation of the mod logs. This misrepresentation is misleading to unsuspecting readers.

After seeing such wilful blatant misrepresentation, forgive me if I'm having difficulty just taking your word for it.

distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
This is a terrible misrepresentation of the mod logs. Your comment seems to be creating a strawman. All the accounts you wrote in your comment were not banned for being sockpuppets. They were banned for spamming (whatever that means). Totally different things.

Nobody said they were sockpuppets. Only you are saying that in an attempt to create a strawman and mislead unsuspecting readers. We are not idiots.

The two accounts that were banned for sock-puppeteering were 'i2' and 'thatworkshop'. And you have conveniently omitted these two accounts from your comment. What do you have to say about them? You invited them. And they were sock-puppetting? How do you explain that?

distcs··on Ask HN: Ultra lightweight independent websites with interesting content?
Thanks! Interesting website. Is the domain name referring to atomic number 14 -- silicon?
distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
Only 2 of all the banned accounts have been flagged as sock-puppeteers. You can't see the sockpuppetery anymore because the mod deletes their posts/comments. But the evidence is still there as negative points. Those profiles have negative points. So they must have posted something sometime, got downvoted, got flagged by users and got detected as sockpuppets.

Sock puppet is only one possibility. Other possibility is legit accounts forming a voting ring. You and me cant see voting actions. Mods can.

The mods have access to server access logs. Mods can see who +1-ed whose posts/comments. So if you need evidence for sock-puppetry or voting-ringery, try asking the mods about it. We can only speculate here. I'm only describing what I've found in the wild from my days of moderating (small) forums.

I mean to say that only because you can't see the other accounts posting related posts/comments does not make them any more likely or any less likely to be sockpuppet or voting ring. They may be legit. But they could be a ring. Or they may be legit. Only the mods with the access logs can tell.

distcs··on Patching GCC to build Actually Portable Executables
Sockpuppets or voting rings may not be posting related posts/comments at the moment but they could in future. And they could be silently +1-ing each other's posts/comments which you can't see but mods can.

I've done moderating work when phpbb forums had their heydey. The clever sockpuppet accounts or voting rings don't start posting about the projects of their main account right from the first day. The clever ones remain dormant, mostly idle, participating in other discussions. They look just like normal accounts.

But much much later when the main account posts a "show project" post, the sockpuppets or voting rings add +1 or post a few words of praise and then move on to commenting on +1-ing other posts.

And voting rings become more difficult to detect when they don't post anything related, post unrelated stuff but quietly upvote the main account's posts/comments.

distcs··on Any coder good enough to solve DSA OA questions within 30 minutes?
Can you expand the acronyms? DSA? OA?
← PreviousPage 3 of 11Next →