2,153 karma · joined July 14, 2011
Founder of Phenona (acquired by ActiveState in June 2011), then Cloud Engineer at ActiveState, interviewer at Karat, now working on calmbox (https://thecalmbox.com)
http://daniilkulchenko.com/
hi@daniilkulchenko.com
@dkulchenko
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dkulchenko; my proof: https://keybase.io/dkulchenko/sigs/cl5s7-RPu-RRimreOlsa5Iyd2mYcV5CNTDI1s4S78b0 ]
It seemed (though perhaps the footage was slowed) that the plane descended vertically pretty slowly, so it would've banged the nose on the carrier at touchdown, but would that have been severe?
I'm sure people will immediately chime in and say that Thinkpads work well with Ubuntu or that System76 does the job, and I'm sure it does, but the experience of running OS X on Apple hardware is simply unmatched.
Much like depression, but specifically work related.
I've been there, and come back there at times when I overwork myself and don't get outside enough. Not fun.
It's happened before. Seems like a risky and stupid decision on their part.
"Note that 4K DisplayPort operation is only compatible with the new Mac Pro (Late 2013). 4K HDMI operation is compatible with MacBook Pro (Late 2013) and the new Mac Pro (Late 2013). HDMI input is not available in the European-market Sharp PN-K321."
"This is a reminder not to let a digital world full of others’ moments deceive you into devaluing your own. Their moments are infinite – yours are finite and precious."
For some time now, I've been spending the majority of my day jumping between Reddit, HN, and YouTube. Any time that I'm not on the computer, from the time I wake up to the time I go to bed (with a few exceptions), I'm listening to podcasts. Basically never idle, and rarely truly living my life - just endlessly consuming information in an attempt to fill the void.
I used to be a builder, living the high described in the post almost every day, but I've lost it somewhere along the way.
Something I hope to change. This post was a big kick in the pants for me.
There are homeless people who are objectively happier (and often, healthier) than some of the richest people in the world.
Otherwise very, very cool.
It's there to prevent abuse of your otherwise unlimited gigabit connection for only $70/month to run a filesharing website on that saturates the connection 24/7/365. If you want to use Google Fiber for business use, pay for their business plan, simple as that.
EDIT: Seems a few people are missing a key detail. When you buy a personal Google Fiber plan, you're not paying for an unmetered 1Gbps upstream/downstream fiber connection. You're paying for an unmetered 1Gbps upstream/downstream connection for personal use. (https://fiber.google.com/legal/terms.html).
There are services that will sell you purely unmetered, unrestricted bandwidth, but it won't be Google Fiber, and it won't be for only $70/month.
Sure, we can fight this in the courts, and a few secret programs might get shut down, but operations will just continue under a different name. We can encrypt our data, move our services and data offshore, but that just paints a big target on our heads - doesn't actually address the fundamental issue. This is supposed to be a democracy, but I don't see any democratic way of addressing this.
What do we do?
I made the switch because I no longer had the time and interest in maintaining my OS - I wanted it to just work. Much can be said for Linux distros' improvements in hardware support over the years, but it pales in comparison to paying for a superbly built computer (even Torvalds uses an MBA) and never having to think about hardware compatibility or OS breakage again. That's worth the (significant) premium in cost for me, and it is worth it for many others on HN.
(This is only on the desktop side, obviously; I use an Android phone and run Debian/Ubuntu on my servers.)
Google "startups" and you tend to end up on a YC page pretty fast, and on HN soon after.
It's $50 for the first line (unlim text/talk/2G web), then $10/month for 2.5GB 4G, or $20/month for unlimited 4G.
I'm getting really tired of hearing this defense from U.S. officials. Just because something's legal doesn't mean it's constitutional and/or morally right. I don't think anyone's still arguing the legality of these programs - we're saying that they shouldn't be there because they violate the spirit (and arguably, the letter) of the 4th Amendment.
They were more than likely licensed for it, it's only $24.95/month for business use (http://www.dmx.com/pandora/).