Do the faxes get sent straight to a computer or printed out? If the former, I wouldn't expect anyone to care, but the latter, en masse, could surely cause some disruption. No?
398 karma · joined June 22, 2011
That line is particularly appalling and represents one of the many things that is wrong with our education system. That logical progression is what encourages people to cheat (plagiarism and paying for essays count).
Maybe try something more like "Getting feedback and incorporating it into your thought and work process will help you get it right the next time for your whole life."
They even provide an RSS feed of new trailers.
2. Connect
3. Discover
4. Me
Has anybody actually polled the device volume level and ambient noise level when people are playing their game?
Google, please go back to innovating. People like you because you do new and exciting things, not because you have your hand in every business sector. Giant acquisitions like this and MoMo help nobody.
Edit: I'm not trying to say Google shouldn't protect their business, but I, at least, would prefer them to do it through innovation rather than buying giant companies.
Actual Google search link that will work when clicking through to WSJ.
The problem, at least for me, is finding a non-trivial example of using an anonymous function. Does anybody have other examples like malkia's[1] that demonstrate why anonymous functions and closures are useful? Or maybe just a good explanation of functional programming?
In my experience, managing C projects becomes frustrating pretty fast but maybe that's a problem with all languages (most of my limited experience is in C).
When you launch a new product into a new market, the features (i.e. what it actually does) end up being slightly more important than the design. The design is obviously still important, but probably not the most important part of your product.
P.s. I really like the retro-beach lifeguard metaphor for customer service.
But just come out and say "we had to cover the site in ads and couldn't do a better design" if that's the case.
All the "terrible/unusable design" criticisms are quite valid today, I think. Maybe they weren't 5 years ago when the site was designed, but there is simply too much information to process now.
This guy sounds like the redesigner really hurt his feelings.
Why not share the design constraints that the redesigner failed to consider? Wouldn't that be more productive than complaining about link baiting and criticism?