doc_ick

Curious, I wonder why Visual Basic is so high up on the list?

Fair enough, I think we are in agreement then. I just greatly dislike the platitudes of OpenAI or llm companies being on a high horse with laws, when something like this happens and bends backwards against general ownership.

1 single person in their basement would be thrown in jail for downloading the whole internet, but a company with “plans” is fine.

As you said earlier, OpenAI can do nothing wrong whatsoever with the data/computation they have for their “greater purpose”.

We disagree on this point.

I would disagree with the Anubis effectiveness falling off, but the llm bros are throwing life itself into training to defeat any “perceived” challenge.

I guess we can agree to disagree, as I don’t think I can ever 100% trust any unregulated company with infinite data/computation. *regardless of their perceived goal

They may say they have the best of intentions, but call me skeptical.

That is a large enough gray area for me that I think it should be more regulated. If llms do truly help “a greater good” then the company, govt, or something should pay or work with the data hosters. Otherwise it’s back to llm company needs your biometrics to save the world…eventually…, but trust them.

Would still say it’s a token predictor, a fancy one though. I suppose we can agree to disagree.

Sounds like a fun llm that’s “fixing” things.

So for you, everyone should only be good as the worst nation.

Thank you for providing an arxiv!

An aside, I finally do appreciate single column format now, makes it easier to convert to epub.

I mean if you want to let llms do everything for you go ahead. Wall-e implications aside, it seems like a great self centric life.

If you ignore history everything is perfect, or at least a controlled slight deviation.

Please feel free to cite sources then, otherwise I see no relevancy from you.

Just skimming through here but I think you have the wrong ideas with llms, I’d recommend Andrew Ngs course (correct me if you’ve already seen it or something similar).

Why isn’t ranking the score of an llm output against what it is “supposedly” predicting?

Just like how reading a math book doesn’t teach you math, why do they make us read anyway? (Sarcasm) if reading a blog post didn’t teach someone how a car works how come it “can” work for next token predictors

Oh that’s ez, for software we know that has bugs, one reason could be the cost of fixing isn’t worth it.

100%

Are you saying laws shouldn’t restrict any company that give out an open source next-token iterator?

I think that’s more hopium ethics.

…you’re saying the folks who tried suing OpenAI for accumulating their data filed a stupid copyright? And dead?

Just the lack of regulation becoming an issue

I don’t have access to a 16-digit code, can you share?

Don’t worry, raw milk will save the day

*they said crying

*not

Probably that it’s blue and is run by a non Christian is my bet.

How? Is there a working example? I ended up switching to go before I started digging down the rabbit hole of vagrant based builds

Copyright law can be misused and can inhibit some advancement, but the fact that “certain groups” or “certain companies” can just ignore laws with no ramifications is something else. If it’s probably life-saving or a pipeline of a dream (see Elon musk always promising FSD), then they should pay or prove the end result.

You know this has taken time to sift in my head, personally I disdain it as for me it seems more similar to a real product or a PoC.

My definition of a tech provocation would be a plain website, showcasing the idea and potentially exaggerating to prove point. I think the point of making a website, seemingly making a full app, putting it on the App Store, and setting up a paid plan seems to have intention to provide a real product.

But alas, I am salt cube using a paper map so my path may be wrong and salty

Don’t worry, I’m sure they they tested each and every llm provider equally, especially Twitter.

All right Mike Lindell calm down