2,517 karma · joined February 20, 2007
My (largely neglected) site is https://adammalinowski.co.uk
This is a common misconception: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfocus
"It is typical for individuals with ADHD to say they 1), cannot focus on boring things and 2), can only focus on stimulating things, and that focus is often extreme. Thus it is both a concentration deficit and over-concentration, or generically: "hyperfocus." More concisely, some types of ADHD are a difficulty in directing one's attention, not a lack of attention"
Am a little disappointed actually, that would be a handy reference. Though naturally such a thing would almost immediately devolve into arguments about the degree to which anything is bullshit, but that could still be valuable.
(Thanks patio11 for drumming this into my head!)
This isn't too surprising, since I think London rents were seriously testing what the market would bear - plenty of chatter about London becoming completely unaffordable.
In London, probably the biggest/richest market outside of USA, that sort of salary is beyond what most experienced developers get, even some very good ones.
I must be missing something here (some sort of bubble?) because I can't see how businesses can be profitable paying those sort of salaries to people who know almost nothing about professional programming. Either that or businesses in America are just waaaay ahead of Europe at turning code into cash.
Since 2013 councils can levy an “empty homes premium” of an additional 50% council tax [1]. No idea how many actually do.
The rate of unoccupied dwellings in London is 1.7% [2]
1. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/21/tens-thousan...
2. http://www.emptyhomes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Empty-H...
Had some debate with myself if I should start by focusing on training for shopping pages (product pages & product reviews) - because that might make some money; or start by training for forums - which I'd enjoy a lot more. Or build a more general system which would definitely never work and never get finished.
Google actually let you filter by "discussions" until a few years ago, so they certainly do this kind of classification. It didn't work perfectly but sometimes did the trick. Don't know why they removed that feature.
They also had to build a crawler, systems to calculate pagerank on relatively huge graphs, and the search engine.
That is years of decidedly non-trival hard work, both academic and engineering - pretty much the opposite of the 'snowball' the author claims it to be.
That time and space was invaluable for me, gave me the time to work on myself, to figure out what was important, and come back stronger.
I feel a lot better for doing it - but even ignoring that, I'm sure it has had a huge ROI on the missed income I 'spent' by not being employed.
Looking for my next role at the moment, I'm having to use up a lot of energy just resisting the urge to think about doing a hiring startup. It seems like such a ripe target for disruption, and sure as hell would be scratching an itch.
The problem is in the hands of TrendCo, they can be used crudely to find the trendy hire who has the exact same ideas about engineering as the hiring person. Because giving the test costs TrendCo nothing, they are happy to throw people at it until they randomly find someone who is exactly what they are looking for.
Anecdotally, I and 2 people I later befriended applied for the same role. We each spent 4 hours on the task, all 3 of us strong coders who made a solution that would be suitable for any startup, all 3 taking different approaches based on our styles. We were all rejected, because none of the 3 of us hit upon the exact approach the company was hoping for, but didn't ask for. There was no opportunity to ask for this feedback either. And it took them nearly a month to bother looking at my code (even after I called).
Since then, I won't take these kind of tests unless I have reason to believe they are being given in good faith as a way to determine if a programmer is capable, not as a way to find their perfect ideal of a programmer.