How far away is network support?
Like hosting bitsnbites.eu on it?
1,310 karma · joined June 27, 2014
How far away is network support?
Like hosting bitsnbites.eu on it?
Wait, you can use both?
This can't be true... How...
Ok. Now i finally have the opportunit:
I would appreciate your thoughts of pros and cons with them?
(Yes, I know I'm late to the party).
Search after files, history or navigate directories.
0F ? That can't be right?
My Mitsubishi gives heat to around -31F (MSZ-RW Sumo)
My highlights:
- First version of Windows (1.01)
- SerenityOS <3
- and even ReactOS
Pretty much all successful indie games use typed languages. Of course, there is a mix with untyped scripts in there too. But many only depends on typed languages.
From my experience it doesn't but onedrive provides, sometimes, filesizes that are wrong, so checking file integrity is a tiny bit more of a pain.
Like: simulate a.out
And it would give me a report for each line of code and tell me everything that happened on that line. Was it a cache miss? False sharing? Etc.
I would pay a lot for that software.
I mean, 1.7 kg / l is not just wrong, it is obvious wrong. Fuel and oil does not sink to the bottom of the ocean.
For me, it sounds like city models such as cars and buildings will be one of the easiest models to generate (from what I have seen in papers).
As an indie dev myself I'm counting on that I will be able to buy most 3D content for a fraction of time/cost in a couple of years. And I plan my development around this and ignore art assets for now.
Sure, the implementations today are thin layers over D3D12, Vulkan and Mantel. But it is a proper API, cross platform and without the implementation overhead.
Next time I need to draw some graphics I will definitely use WebGPU instead of OpenGL or Vulkan.
PS. Don't let the name fool you. It is a proper render API, Mozilla has written their implementation in rust and Google in C++.
Would not be surprised if WebGPU do get native support by the drivers in the future.
Data oriented design is about structure the data in regard of how it is processed and the hardware. This is opposite of object oriented design which models the data around your mental model.
For example in DoD you could design a map with keys in one array together and one array of values. This would make it much faster to iterate over keys while searching because of cache memory.
While in object oriented you would store an array of pairs.
Both approaches can use data-driven.
Edit: would -> could
But when quickly reading the intro text, I found it doing the opposite, it talks too much and abstracts away the key concepts. Only me who found it a bit ironic of not drinking the wine?
If no, I agree with you, but if it indeed does... Why should we not compare resolution in the higest dimension here too? We already have a term for linear resolution, voxel size.
(But yes. I agree with your clickbait argument here. Could have been better to use voxel size in the heading)
It sounds to me as a perfect language for SIMD?
There is a probability (only indirect rumors) that F-35 can already be detected in some situations on some systems (global eye?) and there is definitely no guarantee that F-35 will keep it's stealth ability in the future.
this is awesome, thank you for your work.
I believe you are right. The DMS (Driver Montering System) needs to work on so many outliers: damaged face, porslin eye, niqab and other health related issues. It is more important that the system let these people be able to drive the car than it is to stop abuse.
Many car manufacturers test the DMS alot regarding of how to trick them when they select the supplier but so far they don't want to pay for better protection (to my knowledge). (Well. they don't want to pay for anything to be honest but still have all the features)
I believe there will be a cat and mouse situation for a while until it get to expensive to catch them or to inconvenient/costly/looking stupid for the driver to trick the system.
But I am sure it is harder to trick DMS system than Teslas system today. And harder means fewer people will do it.
disclaimer: one of many engineers working with this.
(It is btw one of the most interesting problems I have encountered. Just think for a second of all engineering expertise you need: biological, optics, electronics, medecin, high performance computing in C and assembly (you need to get it to run on a "toaster") , AI (a lot), etc. etc. Just collecting ground truth of drowsiness is a tricky topic by it self... if someone here has a boring job, I highly recommend to think about this field)
There are several sites (upplysning.se for example) that show full length of the personal ID. How does that work if it is not public information?
If we used turns for cos and sin we could redefine what e^ix means so it works without radians. From the other answer I guess this is completely wrong...
(I do understand it is nuts to redefine, i'm just interested as a theoretical thought)
Now, how is Eulers formula is deduced? How did we figure out what e^ix means?
(Unity do have animations tools for artists (it is partly made for artists) but not so good for vector graphics and not close to flash, and definitely not back then.)
But an app with vector animations should have been doable (not to hard in theory) if you could have found the investment for it, right?