1,489 karma · joined May 8, 2011
I am guessing all those "heavy IDE" users aren't subscribers to the "code in the cloud" paradigm. Yet.
I have seen numerous counts of "He is fast and efficient, but we end up suffering due to the (non) maintainability of his code", followed by "We had to let him go." or "He has been moved to this sole person project."
Your call.
StackOverflow typically gets first-click answers. It's fast enough.
The answer to 'Why' is 'No Bullshit'. http://www.gandi.net/no-bullshit
All in all, Awesome.
It doesn't seem to be. For most part, it's the same e-mail headers that every other e-mail client uses to show threads: http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
Not really. It will simply create a new class of startup pitches. "We have this idea. Fund us now and we will return to you with a MVPFP - "Minimally Viable Product For Patent". Big companies of the world will still fund it.
On the counter-side, I would have been okay if they sent a mass-mailer saying "We have introduced a new feature on Quora - now you know how your peers are doing with Quora!" - making it sound marketing-like, but in reality, percolating the information to their users in the most seemingly-harmless way possible. This could have won them actual fans for this feature.
The immediate manager is a major reason, from what I've seen, for why people leave or love their jobs. The manager may not even share the same ethics that need to flow down in the company from the founders/owners, and may even work towards ensuring her/his own appraisal success. This is why maintaining the big company's culture is such a tough task, and one bad hire at a senior level can slowly destroy major chunks of it.
I am a single founder. And without going much into the topic itself, I would suggest:
1. Several accelerators and investors play safe, and common world statistics go against single founders. These accelerators are not the ones to blame for it.
2. You have to convince them that you're an exception to the common statistics they see everyday.
3. A good way to do this is to show that you can build a worthy team (but I guess you're not yet at that stage).
4. You didn't make Point 2 happen with this accelerator. Try again, elsewhere?
Other than that, insufficient context details. Please elaborate.
This is something I would share and recommend.