250 karma · joined September 13, 2015
Nevertheless I would like to read more about this claim:
> It [PGP] was designed in the 1990s, and in the 20 years since it became popular, cryptography has advanced in ways that PGP has not kept up with. So, for example, it recently turned out to be possible for eavesdroppers to decrypt messages without a key, simply by tampering with encrypted messages. Most technologists who work with PGP don’t understand it at a low enough level to see what’s wrong with it.
(I admit I am one of these technologists)
There are no strings attached, besides providing reports on scientific contributions achieved throughout the project.
It's not like the BND will come knocking on your door saying make algorithm X weak or you will not receive funding (or worse).
For psychics and religion? not so much. People who blindly take what they are told as the truth may make life defining decisions based on the "advice" given. In some cases the outcome may be benign or even positive, but in most cases a real persons action are influenced by statements not grounded in reality. So overall it is valid to call out these "services" as fraudulent IMO.
[1]https://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/research/photonics/eu-2018beyond-5g...
I think the issue isn't the recreation/repackaging but the omission of an honest discussion of how the new approach differs or what is done differently.
"This ISG is seen as a transitional group i.e. a vehicle for the 5G community (and others of interest) to first gather their thoughts and prepare the case for the Internet community’s engagement in a complementary and synchronised modernisation effort."
The efforts seems to be in an quite early stage for now (architecture, models, requirements, etc).
I personally don't see TCP/IP going anywhere with 5G, but we may see more parallel deployments of protocols within isolated 5G network slices.
[1] http://www.etsi.org/technologies-clusters/technologies/next-...
Then why bring this up?
[0] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/password-hasher-pl...
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/photography/comments/5nxj2h/harvard...
I would classify this as a hack rather than "can be installed"