305 karma · joined April 21, 2019
It's possible the author's language is poor, it's also possible it's very good but they see "great" as normal and so discount what they know due to imposter syndrome.
I've heard a lot of people apologise for their English after speaking flawlessly.
On the issue of generalising alpha go learned go by watching human played games and by playing against itself and is now better than any human. So it's not true that a system is limited only to the skill of the examples it's shown, it's possible to design something which can surpass the examples it learned from.
Even several months before Alpha Go beat Lee Sedol there were people saying the AI could be good but never great. Now everyone admits it's super human.
I agree that getting really texture and subtlety in the work is really hard. However a really good system has the possibility to be better than any human has ever been, and IMO that's super exciting.
Here's a video of someone failing to get pricing in advance for a medical procedure and an article about how many simple tasks need licences.
The fact that a lot of areas only have 1 broadband provider blows my mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tct38KwROdw
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/02/17/america-should-...
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/50-mi...