1,046 karma · joined September 8, 2022
1. Pressure to maintain numbers 2. Fear and silence 3. Young ‘uns and a bigger-than-life CEO 4. Weak board of directors 5. Conflicts of interest overlooked or unaddressed 6. Innovation like no other company 7. Goodness in some areas atones for evil in others
Umberto Eco's 14 signs of fascism:
1. The cult of tradition. 2. The rejection of modernism. 3. The cult of action for action's sake. 4. Disagreement is treason. 5. Fear of difference. 6. Appeal to social frustration. 7. The obsession with a plot. 8. The humiliation by the wealth and force of their enemies. 9. Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. 10. Contempt for the weak. 11. Everybody is educated to become a hero. 12. Machismo and weaponry. 13. Selective populism. 14. Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak.
Each list contains symptoms of some degenerating organisation. However, I can easily find counterexamples of successful organisations which demonstrate one or more of these qualities. In fact, these organisations may be successful because they exhibit one or more of these qualities. This way of understanding the world is entirely juvenile and unfit as an evaluative framework.
Granted, this has caused a huge surge in body dysmorphia in teenagers and a rise in use of performance-enhancing drugs, but regardless I think this might be an indication of future change to come.
I'm 21 with a BMI of 28, 6'4". I'm pretty sure I have some sort of eating disorder. It is so f*cking hard not to overreat. Ozempic would really help me out here, because willpower alone is not enough for me to fight a billion dollar industry trying its damndest to make me addicted.
(a) Identify (or write) a song that requires Θ(n3) time to sing the first n verses.
(b) Identify (or write) a song that requires Θ(nlog n) time to sing the first n verses.
(c) Identify (or write) a song that requires some other weird amount of time to sing the first n verses.
Any ideas?
I feel like freedom and self-autonomy form part of the ethos of a hacker, but hell I might be wrong.
I think twitter is especially fortunate to have the audience diversity it has to make this work - there seems to be a good mix of both left and right wing leaning users. A consensus model with such diversity encourages compromise.
I feel like the strength of using this model is that it's low stakes - at the end of the day it's a tweet. People are willing to make concessions, because it's a tweet. As soon as, say, money is involved, I think that willingness to find a middle ground goes away.
edit: lets goo!!!
If you're selling commercial products for a mass market, I think doing things like sponsored content might be more effective.
If I'm selling products to businesses or a few customers, it's better to do outreach by attending industry events, talks etc... I think the cold approach still works.
Advertising is an assumed cost of business for any medium to large company these days, but I feel there's a growing silent minority who slowly believe, slowly know, that advertising in the online space is unfeasible for a majority of products. Advertisers like google make so much money because online advertising is one of those things that is super easy to keep throwing more money at. I wonder how many companies would benefit from entirely ditching online advertising and pursue alternate methods like direct outreach or sponsored content.
We might see 4,000-10,000 advertisements a day[1]. Do you remember two advertisements you saw today? Mere-exposure effect is the only thing going for it. Which may be fine if you're Coca-Cola, not so much if you run an online clothing store.
[1]https://webtribunal.net/blog/how-many-ads-do-we-see-a-day/#:....
SciFi/Space collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/albums/72157638...
King's Topographical Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/albums/72157716...
Our own self concept is based on the story we tell ourselves. This is an important emotional/intellectual regulatory tool we deal with in a daily basis. Evolution gave us self reflection because it's very useful to us. But it doesn't mean it's a reflection of reality.
I am aware that WW had it's own business issues to deal with, but it's still salvageable, right?
Not trying to be dismissive, but statements like that reminds me of "Miracle Drug Ivermectin[0]/Industrial Bleach[1] Cures Covid After XX Hours"
[0] https://www.monash.edu/discovery-institute/news-and-events/n... [1] https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavi...