IMHO, it less scary than living in New York, Washington, Beijing, Moscow, and so on. They are the main targets.
1,205 karma · joined July 10, 2019
If F is defined as `ra•rx`, then `ri == 1`, and inverse will be `rx = 1/ra`.
If F is defined as `ra + rx`, then `ri == 0`, and inverse will be `rx = 0 - ra`, where negative radius means hole.
If F is defined as `ra²•rx²`, then `ri == 1²`, and inverse will be `rx = sqrt(1/ra²)`.
If F is defined as `ra² + rx²`, then `ri == 0²`, and inverse will be `rx = sqrt(0 - ra²)`.
And so on.
Now, we need a Tinder for investments.
You liked a company which liked you in return, now you both can go to interview.
Any VC's there? I need a few millions to make it reality.
When Russian outlets and TV channels will present both RF and Western points of view, I will watch them, but currently I prefer to read EUvsDisinfo.
> a website which quite aggressively translates the official Western stance
«Aggressively»? It's not a TV channel in each major country and a show at prime time at major channels in RF, with 9 zeroes in budget. It's just a site with few guys.
> For reference, I do know both Russian and Ukrainian (the latter to an extent of being able to understand news), so I built my opinion based on Ukrainian media and social networks.
I guess, you're already banned from pro-Ukrainian social circles, because I see no guys like you anymore in FB. Which is a bit sad, because I like to argue with them to better understand our enemy. Where I can meet people like you on FB or YouTube?
It's in law. See law about defense of Ukraine. All gov workers must take actions against aggressor.
> Ukraine has media control agency and laws which regulate quite strongly
Thank you for your kind words, but you are contradicting yourself: how such strong agency can be developed in a rotten democracy?
> Opposition media was regularly pressured by this agency
s/opposition/Russian/g
Yes.
> instead Zelensky simply used unconsitutional executive order.
It's by law. President is defense commander at time of war. Law about Defense says that time of war begins after a first battle with an aggressor and ends at the end of war, so time of war started in 2014 and continued today.
It's looking like you have misunderstanding about how liberal democracy (равноправное народовластие) works.
In dictatorship, people serve a Great Leader. In regular democracy, majority wins.
In liberal democracy, unlike regular democracy or dictatorship, value of human life is equal to infinity, thus value of a single human life is equal to value of whole nation, even when it's poor black gay against top elite: they are equal.
This creates a problem at time of war, because liberal democracy cannot force it citizens to go to war to defend the state or do any other actions required for survival. To solve this problem, liberal democracy must have two modes: peace time mode and war time mode. In peace time mode liberal democracy works as intended, in war time mode liberal democracy works as dictatorship.
Was multiple times already that a dictator or fascists country tried to capture «rotted» liberal democracy, thinking «we can capture them in 2 weeks, before they even create a defense committee», only to see as democracy switches to war time mode, creates effective chain of command, then beats sheet out of aggressor.
I recommend to watch http://justiceharvard.org/ (Russian translation is available), if you want to understand how liberal democracy is constructed.
The goal of V. Poopking is to make billions for him and his friends in RF and Germany. For that, he needs Nord Stream 2 to work, so he needs to exchange something for Nord Stream 2. RF has weak economy, so it has nothing to propose in exchange, except safety from RF army.
If RF does not invade Ukraine, Germany will allow Nord Stream 2 to work, which is beneficial for both Poopking and his German partners. Goal achieved.
See facts at https://euvsdisinfo.eu/
s/opposition/Russian/g
Yes, IPv4 packets and address range are too small to support IPv6, but IPv6 can encapsulate them with room to spare, so IPv6 network can address and handle IPv4 networks and hosts directly. However, this may enable two disconnected IPv4 networks to communicate via IPv6, if they are both announced at ipv6 network.
For example, my notebook is behind IPv4 NAT, but bots were able to scan and try to log into my SSH via IPv6 (miredo). Theoretically, when IPv6 will support both IPv6 and IPv4, I can expose my internal IPv4 network via IPv6, which may create security risk, same as for IPv6 native network without NAT.
This is the key problem: people don't want to expose internal networks to the public, so the feature was cut with hope that everyone will switch to IPv6 and this will no longer be a problem.
In 2004, I was lead of OPS team, so I spent some time trying to invent a way to switch our internal network to IPv6, when it will hit mainstream, and found that seamless transition is not possible at all: IPv6 requires switch, because backward compatibility is disabled, just because a corporation asked for that.
> The "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address" is now deprecated because the current IPv6 transition mechanisms no longer use these addresses.
«We forbid you to go right because we are going left.» It doesn't look like a technical issue. How I should call it?
$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.048 ms
$ ping ::1
PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.044 ms
$ ping6 ::1
PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.043 ms
$ ping6 127.0.0.1
ping6: 127.0.0.1: Address family for hostname not supported
[0]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.5....
I have CO2 monitor, which I use to estimate is my brain working or not: when I'm working, CO2 level raises quickly above 1000ppm, so I need to ventilate my room often; when I'm idling, e.g. by playing a simple game, CO2 level is at about 740-790ppm without ventilation for whole day.
When I'm returning from work, I see at CO2 monitor that my head is still working. Yes, I'm able to «work» sustainable 4h per day only, but «work related activity» consumes my brain for whole day.
Yes
> includes an MIT license file
Maybe. MIT license permits additional license restrictions on top of license. For example, MIT code can be copied into a proprietary system with a different license, which will forbid copying code out.
| ____ |
| |o o| |
| "" |
| O O |
| \ / |
| X |
| / \ |
| O O |September 16, 2019? It's easy: blast at BSL4 lab «Vector».
«On September 16th, 2019, an explosion occurred at the State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology building (Vector) in the city of Koltsovo, in the Novosiberisk region of Siberia, Russia (1). The affected building was a BSL 4 virology research centre, and one of only two known sites housing variola virus, the cause of smallpox. The facility has one of the largest collections of dangerous pathogens in the world. Whilst laboratory safety breaches are common and do not usually result in epidemics, explosions are rare. Unlike a needlestick injury or an accidental shipping of live anthrax, an explosion of this magnitude is likely to lead to a physical breach of the integrity of the laboratory, possibly affecting multiple parts of the structure and equipment within. An explosion is sudden, uncontrolled and unpredictable, and involves force which may result in pathogen release into the surrounding environment. An epidemic which arises in close proximity to the explosion could spread beyond the affected region or even globally, which makes this event a concern for global public health.»
The process is not fully transparent. It means that it's easy to create two laws, which are contradicting each other, or modify laws against their original purpose, etc., because it's hard to see consequences when the law is not transparent. For example, our ex-president Yanukovich just replaced Constitution on president site with an older version. Yes, it's online, but it took 2 years(!) until people noticed that and start to revolt.
In software development, we have test cases, which must be passed. In law development, we have nothing like that.
In my county, we read laws fairly often, because they are easy to get, but most of the time people prefer to read «commentary» — a book about law with comments and cases.
Can you back your claim with facts? UBI is universal, not magic.
> I expect to pay and continue paying a lot,
Just say a number, so we will put it into formula to see is your expected taxation will match minimum requirement for UBI.
Typical wealth distribution without UBI:
^
|
|
| *
| * *
| * *
| * *
| * *
|* * * *
+------------------------------------------------>
^ - number of people, > - income
^ *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *
| *
| *
| *
| * * *
+--U------------------------------------------->
^ - number of people, > - income, U - UBI level
As you see, UBI erases middle class. Everyone becomes poor, except some rich.