In case of rabbits and wolves, more rabbits -> more food for wolves -> more wolves.
I fail to see the link in the case of activists and killers.
1,205 karma · joined July 10, 2019
In case of rabbits and wolves, more rabbits -> more food for wolves -> more wolves.
I fail to see the link in the case of activists and killers.
0 ⋘===8Write the WebUI in a separate HTML page, then start a server and listen for requests.
These people, who advocate to use aged JS libraries to poorly implement modern HTML5 features while breaking accessibility, are the weirdest form of Luddites ever.
curl -s "https://news.ycombinator.com/news"|hq "tr .storylink"
Deploy a website on imgur.comMy £4 a month server can handle 4.2M requests a dayFirst Edition...This is the root cause of the problem. Regular initd + rc scripts are simple enough to be understood by everybody, which systemd is too complex to understand in the limited time we have. There is no "systemd senior developer" or "systemd solutions architect" positions for systemd developers, to adjust investment into systemd ecosystem.
We can easily replace initd by something much more powerful, like perl, javascript, python, java + spring, Emacs, or even Firefox or Eclipse in headless mode. They all are able to read configuration files and launch new processes. But (almost) nobody does so, because they are hard to debug and have very large surface.
[1]: https://docs.rs/anyhow/1.0.42/anyhow/trait.Context.html
You can believe in that, and trust them, but you cannot prove that, unless you have access to the source of everything installed by Google/Apple, and source of third party apps, favored by Google/Apple. But, even if you're working for a government agency and have access to sources, it's still a monumental task to do, because of the volume of the sources. It's why we, Linux owners, were crying when trivial initd and trivial shell scripts, which are easy to read and understand in about an hour or two, were replaced by Systemd, which may take days just to read source.
Moreover, if we are talking about friction and medium (the Ether), then it was predicted long time ago[1], that discussion will be resolved in favor of Ether when Higgs field will be discovered, because Higgs field must be present everywhere, like Ether, and because medium is required for transverse waves to propagate. Discovery of Higgs boson and Higgs field was announced in 2012, so discussion is resolved, but we still call the medium as (physical, quantum) vacuum, like we still call atom as atom («unbreakable») after breaking it, or we use «-» for presence of electrons instead of absence of electrons.
(non-native speaker)
[1]: https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.882562
Light is not immortal, so it loses some energy with time. E.g. gravitational noise can affect photon energy, or photon can lose some energy to medium due to friction, or photon can lose some energy because of truncation of ideal sinusoidal wave at Planck scale, or speed of light is a bit slower than c (because light arrived 16 seconds later than gravitational waves, when gravitational waves were discovered), thus photon is not frozen in time and expands at very slow rate.
«Without some kind of dark matter, unlike any that we have observed on Earth despite 20 years of experiments, big-bang theory makes contradictory predictions for the density of matter in the universe. Inflation requires a density 20 times larger than that implied by big bang nucleosynthesis, the theory’s explanation of the origin of the light elements. And without dark energy, the theory predicts that the universe is only about 8 billion years old, which is billions of years younger than the age of many stars in our galaxy.»
Can we finally abandon Big Shrink (BS) theory? It's obvious now that Oort cloud of Shapley attractor just collided with Dipole Repeller cloud [2].
[1]: https://www.plasma-universe.com/an-open-letter-to-the-scient...
man 8 traceroute
8 is section number for this man page.https://play.golang.org/p/iSjoqGTg20_O
var s []int
s = append(s, 10, 20, 30)
pe := &s[0]
ps := &s
s = append(s, 50)
s[0] = 100
pe2 := &s[0]
fmt.Println("s: ", s, ", ps: ", ps, ", pe: ", pe, ", pe2: ", pe2)
// s: [100 20 30 50] , ps: &[100 20 30 50] , pe: 0xc0000be000 , pe2: 0xc0000b8030