[0]: https://brew.sh/
932 karma · joined August 27, 2018
[0]: https://brew.sh/
Is it possible that you accidentally deleted the `<plaintext>` tag when making your changes? That breaks the page for me.
I am curious. Which browsers do this? I thought this tag is unnecessary in HTML5 because the information that the page is UTF-8 encoded is already implicitly conveyed by the DOCTYPE. (UTF-8 is the only encoding allowed for HTML5.)
But since so many people do not understand the importance of HTML for accessibility, I feel the need to stress that this page may be a horrible experience for non-sighted people.
To sighted people, obscure unicode characters may look like text in a different font, but do they for screen readers? The same goes for ASCII art and the tables on this page.
Do all the fun stuff! But please draw the right conclusions for real-world projects.
But as with you, my muscle memory gets in the way.
If I am right, I suggest just moving on with your life. That is your ultimate goal, and your search for the articles and videos you requested is getting as much in the way of that as your struggle for online privacy.
Here is an interview with them: https://www.totaltypescript.com/rewriting-typescript-in-rust
I plan to dabble with ChatGPT to bounce off ideas. Maybe emulating conversation helps against writer's block as well as the real thing. When real conversations helped me, it was not necessarily the expertise of the other person but the process of articulation that was valuable.
On topic, though, preceding sublists with empty lines is a complete non-starter for me. However, since I don't hard-wrap lines (goal 7), but use soft-wrap only, I am not in the target audience anyways.
One public instance: https://nitter.kavin.rocks/
Github repository: https://github.com/zedeus/nitter
F12: Go to definition
Shift+F12: Go to usages
Ctrl+-: Go back
Ctrl+Shift+-: Go forward
Once you get used to it, it's as easy as browsing the web.
Since I started using VSCode I did not have to work with codebases that were complex enough to make these features valuable but some VSCode language extensions support tree views of call hierarchies and type hierarchies. Here's the documentation for the Java extension.
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/java/java-editing#_call-h...
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/java/java-editing#_type-h...
You can set keybindings for them too.
I never got the point. I want to see exactly what's in the document. With ligatures I have to translate what I see back to what I get. It seems like unnecessary cognitive load to me.
Unlike in any of your examples, the subtext is: "I anticipate you had reasons for doing it the way you did and I am open to listening to them." It engages the author on the same footing, leaves the door open for discussion but still communicates your intent in a straightforward manner.
The current model will probably not even notice what you throw at it.
Of course, these are only valuable if you use a Markdown editor that renders a preview.