292 karma · joined September 27, 2024
Nice selective quoting.
> find a nice compromise that actually works and minimizes people who get abused (like US culture 100 years ago or maybe something else.)
Which is directly countered by pointing out how explicitly abusive and unfair the US was.
Always the most pathetic and fragile men that say this shit.
The 20 year old white girl is an expert on China, right. What a joke of an article. The account could have been an FBI counterintelligence op for all she knows.
That’s the point of a dog whistle. Are people who use (((this))) idiom also not antisemites because they don’t explicitly mention Jews? Also look up Cultural Bolshevism and who used that term.
And which stories? The one about the Israeli US Attorney letting an Israeli pedophile flee the US?
If you are ignorant on something you are better off keeping quiet than regurgitating low IQ propaganda.
Oh and the airdrop was less aid than would have been carried on a single truck. It is PR to cover for the famine.
They also provide enough aid so that the average Gaza gets less calories than the prisoners in German concentration camps got. So no, they aren’t providing shit.
First link is written by a Zionist aligned think tank and the writer is an anti Russian Atlantic council ghoul.
Second is a US opinion piece with zero evidence, which they even admit, to back it up (which is why it went to the opinion column).
The last is Carnegie Politika which, going by all their recent articles, is another anti Russian group. It’s also a commentary piece with zero evidence.
So, yeah, not a strong argument on your part. No evidence of material support. Just lip service like I said.