8,860 karma · joined April 16, 2012
The urbanization driven by the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century didn’t tip the balance to a majority of the US population living in cities until 1920. Other countries were even further behind.
Work From Not Home is the actual historical anomaly here. Information technology allowing people to perform their 21st Century, postindustrial knowledge work at home is just reversion to the mean.
https://dashboard.transitmatters.org/system/slowzones/?chart...
1. As a seller, why would I use your platform instead of the existing ones?
2. As a buyer, why would I use your platform instead of the existing ones?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-experimentation_in_medici...
It's a shame that their bogus jurisdiction argument against admittedly foreign defendants and (but for three) foreign domain names will likely be accepted unquestioningly by the court. They're probably counting on a default judgement, since anonymous defendants rarely show up to defend themselves.
As always, the long arm of US copyright law knows no bounds.
[0] https://www.valuepenguin.com/average-household-budget#food
[1] https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2020/november/average-s...
How would this even be possible, in an economy that is roughly 80% services? All there is to "consume" is the output of someone else's labor. If nobody is working, there is nothing to consume.
It doesn't seem unreasonable to use a cotton grocery bag hundreds of times. That's only a few years of weekly shopping trips.
Regardless, litter from improperly discarded plastic bags was the primary motivator of their regulation. It was not intended to be about resource use or carbon emissions or whatever people are focused on today.
The best Tesla model 3 uses 25 kWh / 100 miles and weighs two tons. A top of the line cargo bike like the Tern GSD is capable of carrying passengers and luggage using only ~1 kWh / 100 miles, because it weighs only 75 pounds.
Slightly reducing the weight of the battery pack in a full sized car is missing the forest for the trees when it comes to lowering transportation emissions. As long as we're supply constrained for lithium battery cells, those 50 kWh of batteries going into the Tesla would be better going into 50-100 e-cargo bikes that each take a car off the road.
"Costs" in Houston don't look so much better than NYC when you add the significantly higher transportation expenses to their lower rents. Also, local salaries are a third less, so you have that much less money for everything.
Listing on the LSE relegates you to "international" funds, which make up a third or less of most portfolios. These have historically lagged US fund performance, quite significantly in the last ten years.[1]
[0] https://www.etf.com/etfanalytics/etf-finder
[1] https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/revisiting-case-internati...
https://www.soundproofingcompany.com/soundproofing_101/build...
Nobody likes cars driving through their neighborhood. If these were good faith concerns, then these folks would be agitating for traffic calming measures instead of trying to quash the exact kind of business that belongs in a "residential area."
[0] https://getneocharge.com/products/neocharge-smart-splitter
Why not? Regular turnover is healthy for both markets and neighborhoods. These beneficiaries of rapidly appreciated properties could sell their home to a new family, and take their profits to downsize to more age-appropriate housing.
A more robust estimate suggests that the living wage is actually $22.59 in this area.