829 karma · joined February 8, 2023
It's like everyone is pretending not to know how volatile LLMs are or even how they work and never saw the "leftist" answers chatgpt was spewing not too long ago.
It's like these people have an axe to grind with Google and are milking this situation for all its worth.
So what if it made the founding fathers look black, it's called AI art for a reason it's not a 1:1 representation of reality.
First I thought the whole thing was a bunch of openai/other LLM investors using the opportunity to go after the competition on twitter but maybe it goes deeper than that.
People are just overreacting over a silly toy.
I don't know how much of it is a perspective thing but it's probably a decent amount.
It's a transformative application of copyrighted materials it's the textbook definition of fair use, and anyone pretending it isn't because of some anti generative AI luddite sentiment is risking to destroy a precedent on which much of the modern internet is built.