937 karma · joined March 3, 2011
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/alind; my proof: https://keybase.io/alind/sigs/2pdcFkwnKpwh7sTJFAMZISSpzDDxKc5sOCjs46kAeY8 ]
> create a copy of objects with a different storage class and delete the old objects. It doesn't make sense that it would just duplicate my objects
Isn’t that exactly what 'copy' means in pretty much all IT contexts?
Perhaps fish is not for you?
[1]: https://nextdns.io/
In any case, tying quality to some tangible, bold measurement like refunds is not a bad idea.
If I was mainly writing and doing some simple graphical work I’d ditch my other devices in a heartbeat.
Not sure if Soulver is newer or less “complete” than Calca, but it is being updated at lot more often. The updates for Calca are very sparse and leads me to think it’s more in a maintenance mode.
In many countries the owner of the contract is liable for anything originating from that line.
It’s great for reading long standard documents and cross reference between them and supporting material like examples etc.
I think it is precisely for these reasons this debate is so important, because it is truly not a clear cut improvement in my opinion.
As opposed to the more direct “approach” in the parent post?
> Ok, so basically she is a bullshit social engineer, masquerading as an 'AI ethics researcher'
Exactly. Special notwithstanding, it’s still a nice feature and not something Windows has to my knowledge, at least not common (i.e. “File is in use” errors). On macOS you can e.g. move a file to trash while it’s being used still by some running program.