1,102 karma · joined July 24, 2019
They’re going to drag down the next two or three generations with their idiocy.
Perhaps a controversial opinion but I can’t wait for an LLM that directly feeds off of the source: like AP news, or Arvix, and automatically provides an RSS feed of non-clickbait headlines with substantive articles if I decide it’s worth reading. I cannot wait to get this profession out of my life, and I will happily pay to make it happen.
With React, what would take me a day in Hotwire can be done in an hour.
I’ll gladly pay upwards of $50-100 per month for an AI that gives me non-clickbait headlines for all the substantial, verified news happening. Tired of having my time wasted by this profession and their obsession with getting clicks.
Why doesn’t this statement also apply to the source of the materials this entity is stealing from?
That’s how I view all these people decrying AI in the face of all the genuine improvements it can bring about.
As far as I can tell the study can’t determine this.
I’m curious as to what you mean when you say liberal agenda.
Take the standard, $5 plan. It gives you 300 searches PER MONTH. That’s 10 per day. I’m sure most of us do 10 searches within minutes while working.
Developer knew exactly what was going to happen.
Should update that to “I love to throw the people who love my digital products under the bus”
This article is about financial success during the time someone is living I have no idea what your comment is supposed to mean.
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/31/1191096086/cyclist-magnus-whi...