Can’t you just immediately use them? The person getting caught will be some random person that took the bill, not the one bringing it into circulation.
5,298 karma · joined October 20, 2023
There’s Superdollars but it doesn’t seem to be a really widespread problem so far, right?
So is this the most plausible way that binance was hacked so far?
Depends on what you’re insuring, no? For theft, it actually makes senses, right? That way, you’re insuring a constant number of coins, no matter what the market is doing. If you’re insurance currency would tank during a bitcoin heist, you would lose the insurance effect.
Is the problem the number or the concept?
Your salary should also go up so the only thing affected is the cash you hold. Would it be better if the currency would be version-bumped every 10 years and rescaled to remove the inflation?
Maybe stupid question but do you then need to run nano through the symlink to get the new bindings or is the existence of a symlink enough? Wouldn’t nano have to check every directory for a symlink to itself to do that? There’s no way to get all symlinks for a specific file without checking the whole file system, right?
How would something that has been in effect for at least 60 years still lead to a worsening mental state over time?
That's the default though
And also you can just serve DNS normally and get the intelligence.
In a working RNG, every number has equal probability.
But there's a probability <1 that the RNG is working as it should and a probability >0 that the RNG erroneously generates numbers that aren't equally distributed.
And because the range of possible numbers is so large and the probability of a mistake is not that tiny, a small result is more likely to be an error than a random result that happens to be small.
If I write a program to flip a coin and it generates heads 30 times in a row, is it more likely that this is just a random result or that I made a mistake in my programming?
One probability is 2^30, and the probability that someone makes an error resulting in this pattern is probably higher than 1/2^30.
Isn’t it actually updating from the bottom? If the text is moving to the left and the bottom seems to be further left, those need to be processed first, right?