On Firefox with uBlock Origin it doesn't work.
I gave it a quick look and it seems like Google Analytics is hijacking the `click` event in the `<a>` tag and it stops working because uBO blocked GA.
138 karma · joined February 5, 2021
I gave it a quick look and it seems like Google Analytics is hijacking the `click` event in the `<a>` tag and it stops working because uBO blocked GA.
You can also press `n`
People should just use duration instead of speed as you did at the end: "takes twice as long", "takes 1/3 of the time..."
Here are some examples:
---
Rust Analyzer:
Clean build: 31.02s
Incremental build: 3.07s (Added a `println!` in a level-2 dependency in the dependency graph)
SLOC: 306,467
SLOC of dependencies: ~879,304 (After removing `win*` packages which make up for another 1.3M)
---
Zola:
Clean build: 24.58s
Incremental build: 1.34s (Added a `println!` in a level-2 dependency in the dependency graph)
SLOC: 17,233
SLOC of dependencies: ~2,087,781 (After removing `win*` packages which make up for another 1.3M)
Obviously, not all source code gets compiled due to conditional compilation but it makes for a good approximate if you only take into account 2/3 of it.
---
For comparison with Zig by building ZLS:
Clean build: 20.13s
Incremental build: 10.27s (I believe this builds the ZLS package again from scratch so not really incremental)
SLOC: 45,806
SLOC of dependencies: I don't know how to get this.
---
This was on a Ryzen 5600x
The alien syntax, the incompatibilities between versions, the outdated information on the internet made it difficult to learn.
I'd recommend to just use python with a library like pyautogui and similar.
I feel like tabs could be better if you let the auto-formatter do its job by setting the tab width to 4 spaces. That should be good enough so that people with a tab width of 2 or 8 don't see the code lines neither very short nor very long. I also feel like most people who use spaces are good with a tab width of 4?
I also would not take into account tab widths not in [2, 8].
AFAIK, the only proposal related to exceptions is adding a `try` block that would scope the `?` operator to that block instead of the current function.
If not, GitHub recently updated their search feature and it's pretty good.
https://github.com/search/advanced
https://docs.github.com/en/search-github/github-code-search/...
If you mean addressing the poor quality of LLVM IR directly, then I don't know.
[1]: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/crane... [2]: https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift
You can also do the opposite, pin the arrow to the label so that if the label moves the arrow follows: double click the arrow to see the path points, select an end point and move it on top of the label until you see the bounding box of the label.
My project leans more to the `hacker` side (ironic, huh). It's closer to a programming tool than a product I'd sell. I wonder if it'd fit there.
[1]: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/2b/e7/cb/2be7cb420de47ac68e1345f4a...
On Firefox it's way laggier but still usable.
Now, when I dream of code, I can hear my inner self saying "no, please! I actually want to rest" because most of the times I feel like I'm in a loop exploring the same solutions over and over.
I've had to get out of bed and do something else so I can go back to sleep without having one of those weird dreams.
There was a man from my city who made me (and millions of people more) like the accordion. He was called "El Rebelde del Acordeón" ("The Rebel of Accordion"). There are no people who won't think of him when the accordion is mentioned in Mexico. Here are some videos
> I learned so much solving problem XXX, so is it okay to publish my solution elsewhere?
> It appears that you have answered your own question. There is nothing quite like that "Aha!" moment when you finally beat a problem which you have been working on for some time. It is often through the best of intentions in wishing to share our insights so that others can enjoy that moment too. Sadly, that will rarely be the case for your readers. Real learning is an active process and seeing how it is done is a long way from experiencing that epiphany of discovery. Please do not deny others what you have so richly valued yourself.
> However, the rule about sharing solutions outside of Project Euler does not apply to the first one-hundred problems, as long as any discussion clearly aims to instruct methods, not just provide answers, and does not directly threaten to undermine the enjoyment of solving later problems. Problems 1 to 100 provide a wealth of helpful introductory teaching material and if you are able to respect our requirements, then we give permission for those problems and their solutions to be discussed elsewhere.
I'd advise anyone who wants to solve the first 100 problems against looking their solutions online. They are simple enough to not require you to research complex topics to solve them as later problems do.
I'd recommend Rosetta Code [2] if someone wants to have a look at a programming language in action.
[1] https://projecteuler.net/about
[2] http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Programming_Languag...
It's Couch to 5k. AKA C25k.
I only point it out because the name is what made me try it out!
x.try_for_each(|y| {...; ControlFlow::Break} )I don't understand this part. Hopefully you can clarify this to me.
If you're sharding by primary key, doesn't that mean that there's a high chance that the shard in your local DB instance won't have the data the web server is requesting?
I'm not familiar with DB management.
Also, how did you come across those books? I just found out about Every Layout in this thread. I'm not a web developer so I don't know if it was advertised in a web dev forum or what.