It's worse than that. For instance in the UK the Establishment itself is dominated by people who regard themselves as victims in one way or another. As victims they are the de facto little guys and act with impunity.
124 karma · joined October 28, 2024
It's worse than that. For instance in the UK the Establishment itself is dominated by people who regard themselves as victims in one way or another. As victims they are the de facto little guys and act with impunity.
https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/products/254923832
Except, no, there are eight teacakes, so they must have bought at least two packets.
Wonder who ate the other four?
https://www.skincancer.org/skin-cancer-prevention/
Clearly more research is needed.
Not circuitry. This is a metaphor which has passed its sell-by-date. It obscures rather than enlightens.
>His neighbours related stories of Heaviside as a strange and embittered hermit who replaced his furniture with 'granite blocks which stood about in the bare rooms like the furnishings of some Neolithic giant. Through those fantastic rooms he wandered, growing dirtier and dirtier, and more and more unkempt - with one exception. His nails were always exquisitely manicured, and painted a glistening cherry pink'
Genius confirmed.
EDIT: one of the traits of creative genius according to Hans Eysenck is psychoticism which includes an indifference to social norms:
https://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Impur...
https://www.newsweek.com/real-lord-flies-true-story-boys-isl...
>The boys had set up a small commune with food garden, hollowed-out tree trunks to store rainwater, a gymnasium with curious weights, a badminton court, chicken pens and a permanent fire, all from handiwork, an old knife blade and much determination
Double denim?
With the decline of Christianity people of the West are now more demotivated than at any time in their history. Our religion was never about knowledge but it did guard the conditions under which the growth of knowledge was possible. Not saying traditional Christianity is the answer however we've thrown out the baby with the bathwater.
Whatever you believe it seems clear that one's experience of life and the world is dominated by inner experience and mental well-being, not by luxuries or technological convenience. One could live in a palace, drive flying cars and so on but still suffer dreadfully.
Although my personal disposition is fairly sunny, verging on the manic, my model of how the world and how my life works is not one of optimism but rather a series of defeats occasionally punctuated by an unexpected victory. Sort of like the fall of the Berlin Wall or how Gollum accidentally destroyed the ring. Eucatastrophe was Tolkien's name for it.
EDIT: I mean the point of abbreviations is to facilitate communication. However with the world wide web connecting multiple countries, languages and fields of endeavour there are simply too many (for example) three letter acronyms in use. There are too many sources of ambiguity and confusion. Better to embrace long-form writing.
e.g. the bit where I hide behind behind a headstone in the graveyard is by no means reliable (maybe 80%?)
Thanks to HN the view count on YouTube has increased dramatically! If it gets past 1000 I'm going to have to record and upload the final section with the combine troops.
EDIT: assuming that is still possible: Valve have made some changes for the twentieth birthday which I noticed today.
e.g. there's more grass and bizarrely the lift button has switched to the other side of the elevator
Regarding the gospels, yes, and to my original point, in John's gospel there is "the disciple whom Jesus loved", implying that Jesus didn't love them all equally.
If someone has a hippocampus or amygdala damaged or removed it's rarely specified whether its the left one, the right one, or both. Presumably it matters!
Both the above structures seem mysterious but I understand they both evolved from older cortex which sort of curled up over evolutionary time. 3-layer cortex rather than the 6-layer of the neocortex. I'd be glad to be corrected here.
The amygdala is associated with fear but it's concerned with desire too. Unwanted desires can be just as inconvenient as unwanted fears.
A classic source of confusion for me is the ubiquitous phrase 'brain circuits'. Is this a metaphor drawn from electronics, or what? 'Circuit' implies a loop but I assume they're just pathways.
Yes, I may show empathy and respect to strangers, patients or clients, trying hard to deal with them fairly and conscientiously. Well said.
But this only operates in the short term.
It doesn't mean I can love them all, or at all, or love them equally, or anything like that. That would be meaningless. We don't know what love is exactly, but it does seem to include a sustained form of attention. It provides a space in which the other person can grow.
Such attention is always specific, by its nature; it latches onto a subject, something recognised yet new in the other. It can't be served out like soup. Yet increasingly businesses, bureaucracies and government pretend that it can!
Absolutely. Society tends to assume that people are interchangeable units and that 'care' is a commodity which can be dispensed evenly as if from an industrial nozzle in a food factory. So we have 'care homes', 'daycare', 'care packages'. We are enjoined to be more 'caring'.
But the reality is that love, which is what we're really talking about, is dyadic.
i.e. between two individuals. That's how it works and how it effects its magic.
A patchwork of dyadic connections is what we may hope for and build.