339 karma · joined December 26, 2022
For instance UNECE regulation 79 prevents FSD from using its full capacity to turn the steering wheel.
It's a rat's nest of red tape.
The revisions and updates are safety tested on roads for months before they are released. Tesla also has models that are too big to run on existing production hardware that perform better than the release versions in test cars.
Updates are not git pulls and no engineer would ever think that they were.
Supervised FSD is already safer than a human.
For enhanced absorbance, alternative technologies that come to mind could be electrodeposition with additives that preferentially bind specific crystal faces, nanoimprint lithography+etching. I was personally involved in developing an electroless deposition technology that created "black gold" that had broadband absorbance across NIR and visible wavelengths. That sucker was black, and easy to make!
Laser patterning is a lot easier than improving thermoelectric device efficiency.
That's the deal we voted for and Tesla grew 2000%. Very pleased with the outcome and would vote for any pay package at any company that was similarly structured.
Incredible value for money in my opinion.
It happens right away and has nothing to do with any other warnings. If you own a Tesla you have seen this warning over and over.
The idea that buying a Tesla doesn't do anything for the environment is just something people who buy gas cars tell themselves as they destroy our climate.
I guarantee half the people posting here will change their tune as soon as they have any responsibility beyond themselves.
I rode the bus for 15 years...when I only had to take care of myself.
The founder went as far as to run for CA senator just to regulate Tesla and bought a Superbowl ad to smear the company. https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/12/dawn-project-tesla-ad-fsd-...
This article is about "testing" conducted by a guy who is trying to sell competing software products and has produced videos in the past that weren't replicable and were likely staged. They never release unedited footage or car diagnostic data, just a produced video presented with the intent of damaging Tesla's reputation and boosting their own sales.
This happens all the time, from the New York Times' false claims that their review car ran out of charge, to the most recent Mark Rober video that cost the CEO of a lidar company his job.
The video in this article requires independent validation it is not from a trusted source as it is produced by an extremely biased and financially motivated Tesla competitor.
FSD will not randomly drive off the road and your post showed a human turning the steering wheel by accident.
Progress:
HW4>HW3 and HW4 cars can see painted walls HW5 exists and will be deployed soon.
Goalposts shifted by you = 2
This person is just too embarrassed to admit they fell asleep at the wheel and the weight of their hand disengaged FSD. This could easily be cleared up if he showed the driver facing camera the car records in a crash.... But something tells me he won't do that.
You don't fact check things very well. That's two blatant falsehoods you've swallowed. What else are you wrong about.
This is literally the definition of progress.
Tesla is currently developing HW5 which has 10x the inference capability of HW3. More progress.