I'll be filing this story under the general theme: rich company distorts genuine social impact rewards and ends up making people poorer in aggregate. Sadly this just seems normal these days...
496 karma · joined November 9, 2011
I'll be filing this story under the general theme: rich company distorts genuine social impact rewards and ends up making people poorer in aggregate. Sadly this just seems normal these days...
Personally, I want to see more organizations devoted to solving problems and boldly becoming obsolete. The predominant reward models do not really seem to reward that.
(Recent semi-related anecdote: see recent nytimes article about what happened to the project devoted towards designing and stockpiling inexpensive ventilators that came into existence after doing a risk analysis around SARS.)
If you go this route, practice using whatever app you're using in off-line mode to verify your map cache data!!!
That being said, definitely practice with paper maps and maintaining a sense of direction. This sounds easy but in an emergency situation this can be a weak link. Nothing sucks more than hiking down the wrong trail for a couple hours when you're racing against sunset. I've also been in many canyons and valleys with screwy GPS and heading readings so it's good to be able to recognize when that tool is going awry.
As far as apps, I mainly use the original Backcountry Navigator. Not the prettiest but it's been solid for me and the author was responsive back in the day when I messaged them.
There's something potentially misaligned between the control of the founders and the final grant value on the other end. There are so many ways to distort this in the final exit deal and these are details that you probably won't learn about unless you happened to exercise stock before the exit happens. In general, the positive outcomes seem "capped" in that a founder is inclined to lock in their gains with an exit if the deal is reasonable for them.
Maybe the option shouldn't be as a share of the company but a share of everything the CEO/founder makes from there on out. :)
For really early stage, I generally assume that a founder is trying to at least 10x their net worth so any hand wavy exit estimate generally gets capped with that in mind.
https://comotion.uw.edu/startups/microvision/
I think the first end users were supposed to be fighter pilots.
While I'm wishing, it would be nice to hear about how they anonymize their logs. Their privacy notice only really mentions scrubbing associated IP addresses - which may not be sufficient.
I'm curious if all this represents a greater risk than powering up the lines. (But at least PG&E won't foot the bill...)
Add a laser scanning system and direct the system to fly into a building... from flights back around 2006-ish: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skdh4Nwm6r4
The Trinity site was compelling from a historical standpoint but it's really just a patch of desert in a missile range. There was small tent set up with information in addition to the markers. Most of the time for the experience was waiting in a car on a road in the middle of nowhere and speculating about occasional bits of debris in the distance.
Both are worthwhile but I'd go for the VLA.
Happened to see it while archiving the inventor's papers. :)