HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

eof

3,444 karma · joined December 21, 2009

geoffgolderatgmail

#gd0t.com

#geoffgolder.com

submissionscomments
eof··on Bitcoin Promoter Gets 2 Years for Silk Road Money Laundering
> But moreover the US never managed to prove the money actually did come from cartels. Their case amounted to: there's lots of cash moving from Mexico to the USA via HSBC. It must obviously contain drug money. Therefore HSBC is guilty.

Mike, where do you get off? Rather.. where the hell are you coming from? Ad-hominem attacking Shrem for being related to the silk road and laundering money; and in the same thread defending HSBC with disinformation?

What's your angle here.

The case did not amount to anything like that. They were literally removing information on transactions that would warrant scrutiny, among many other things much more damning than 'there was a lot of money'.

eof··on Bitcoin Promoter Gets 2 Years for Silk Road Money Laundering
I don't see how a state enforcing categorically insane policy, creating inevitable black market, creating an inevitable marketplace, creating an accidental king-pin, who has allegedly committed murder-for-fire has anything to do with the moral ground on which charlie shrem stands with laundering money for a drug dealer.

There are infinite silk roads and infinite drug dealers forever and always so long as drug policy remains like it is. The state itself is far, far more morally culpable for whatever true evil was actually brought on by Ulbricht than Shrem himself is.

eof··on Bitcoin Promoter Gets 2 Years for Silk Road Money Laundering
Right; but they were getting fucked over in the fiat world left and right up until that point too. Not saying they didn't over-promise and under-deliver but you can't really examine these things in a vacuum.
eof··on Bitcoin Promoter Gets 2 Years for Silk Road Money Laundering
> He's lucky

I'm not sure about that. I don't know the details; but I strongly suspect that while Shrem very likely knew he was laundering 'illegal' money (at least, I think he would have done it whether he knew or not), he was not ripping people off on purpose.

Personally, I find it hard to feel too bad for Shrem; since he was sloppy and loud.. and kind of just had it coming. That being said, I don't think he did anything morally wrong w/r/t what is he is being convicted of.

This is more a case of a bad law and a stupid person than a bad person. In a more reasonable world where people are legally allowed to enter into mutual, private contracts without a nanny state policing people's morals.. what Shrem did could not even be considered a crime.

His fault? sure. Stupid of him? Sure.. but laundering money for drug dealers is not morally reprehensible in its own right (unless they are violent drug dealers); it's just dumb to do in an obvious way with thousands of people watching you (and not even charging a ridiculous mark up!)

eof··on Can a simple algebra test predict programming aptitude?
That might be overly cynical. IF it's true that there is some fundamental way-of-thinking or personality trait that is both in a large minority of people, and necessary to be a proficient programmer; it is extremely valuable to know about it.

A lot of people in the field, myself included, get a hint of intuition that some people either have it or they don't.

If we could get at (or closer to) some basic principle, we could both help people focus on their strengths (by identifying those who show this trait, and being transparent with ones who don't).. and hopefully learn how to cultivate the underlying trait itself.

Wouldn't it be funny/cute/useful if just practicing a bunch of algebra word problems made proficient programmers even better?

eof··on Freelancing: How to talk yourself into charging more
Absolutely! You charge a super fat risk premium. My whole point is that clients will pay significant insurance (easily 100% premium) on a flat rate project.

I don't talk about hours with my clients when doing flatrate work. I am able to be like "okay.. this should take me 10 hours.. so really it will take me 40 hours, this is eaily worth 3k to them.. if i make anywhere from 75-300/hr I am pretty happy" Then I simply quote 3k and tell them they owe nothing if I don't complete the project to specification. I am very tight on specification and only would do this on projects I fully understand.

Even when I have been explicit about risk premiums being 150% of the estimate; clients nearly always choose the flat rate over the hourly with estimate. If I truly believe my estimates; this is an obvious win for me.

This is also why I said you can't do it right away; estimates are notoriously hard to get right, you really have to be a veteran to make more money doing flat rate than hourly; but I stand by my conviction that if you are decent at estimating (within .2 - 3x of the estimated hours); clients are generally happy to pay you the risk premium at a rate that is much higher than the actual risk.

eof··on Show HN: Buttercoin (YC S13) US Bitcoin Marketplace – Free Trading Through Dec
AML, presumably?
eof··on Freelancing: How to talk yourself into charging more
I did not read this article and am only commenting on freelancing in general.

It requires a good understanding, and importantly, articulation of the problem; but flatrate for projects is the way to go. You can charge more and make the client happier. So many software projects fail; that many clients are happy to pay 50-200%+ premiums for the insurance that if you fail to deliver they won't need to pay.

It is hard/impossible to do this when you first start out; but generally speaking if you realize you are selling "peace of mind" rather than whatever it is you are doing; you will make a lot more money and have happier clients.

eof··on Sony Got Hacked Hard: What We Know and Don't Know So Far
> Many people suggest that startups not over-optimize on issues like security and performance when it's not their core business. > The same could be said of Sony:

How so? The whole point of saying it about startups is that they are startups.. they have severely limited capital and resources and need to optimize for growth/revenue/continuing to exist.

This does not apply to Sony. If you are storing medical records and SSNs and you are multi-billion dollar company; there is no viable excuse that looks anything like, "uhh.. yeah well we are really just an entertainment company."

eof··on Show HN: Premium Medical Marijuana Subscription – SF Only
You do realize that the fed does more or less what it wants?: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/24/dea-raid-medical-ma...
eof··on Show HN: Premium Medical Marijuana Subscription – SF Only
The only thing wonky about this is the price. I really like the idea of having curated, nice strains delivered.

However, this is really a service for aficionados, (I think?.. who else would possibly smoke even an eighth a month regularly).

There is no problem getting mega-high quality herb delivered like 'right now' for cheaper than this.. if I were to subscribe to this service (I am not in SF) I would prefer a discount for a subscription lock-in.

This to me is like subscribing to a monthly-book.. where you send me a random book you think I'll like and charge me more-than-retail for it... when I can just get a book (even with recommendation.. every dealer will talk ad-nauseum about their strains) delivered instantly for ever-lower than 'retail' prices.

Curated delivery is good.. prices are a bit steep compared to the market. I smoke more weed than easily 95% of HNers; and I would pay for a subscription service.. but only if that service offered me more value than I could get from any halfway decent distributor (which I think is .. and maybe I am just wrong here .. very very difficult to do), or if it were cheaper than calling them.

I wish you guys luck. 420blazeiterrdayetc

eof··on Ask HN: What's the best 4K computer display available on the market?
for programming, the seiki 4k displays are great. i have had mine for ~6 months; it is wonky for gaming; wonky for over-scanning in some resolutions; and (related to the gaming) only does 30hz at 4k.

It looks great; at first having a 40inch display is crazy; but (again, for doing work.. programming, graphics, writing) i find the lower pixel density great. i am a bit further from the monitor with it being so large; so the bigger text is fine

eof··on Please remove mitsuhiko/*
fair. It seems 'opt-out' is fine to me though and here is why: I want to contribute to some persons tiny little 4-stars github project because it saved my ass.. it is a bit audacious for long-tail repos to be signing up to accept tips; but sometimes my long-tail tip will cross her long-tail repo.

Even more, what does mitsuhiko care if other people are getting money for contributions to his repos. If mitsuhiko is getting spam or seeing stuff in his issue queue despite opting out; that is a serious breach of ettiquite.

It doesn't seem to me this is the case though.. it's like he is angry that other people are getting emails?

eof··on Please remove mitsuhiko/*
It certainly isn't bad news.. not to say ARS isn't likely doomed; but there are currencies not on that admittedly-long list of amazon accepted currencies.
eof··on Please remove mitsuhiko/*
I'm really, really surprised and confused by what seems to be the overall sentiment here.

This tipping project was born of a hackathon combining cryptocurrency (cool) and supporting open source projects. Awesome!

Then when people started getting tipped tiny amounts it generated spam... annoying, but it was fixed.

It's a bit outrageous to claim that emailing someone after they have received free money (over some threshold) to invite them to accept it is going over the line.

Claims about taxes, etc.. are laughable. HOW DARE YOU GIVE ME FREE MONEY AND ALLOW ME TO DECLINE IT. Give me a break.

Overall the tone of alexanderz is extremely reasonable. It is not clear to me why the equivalent of a social-site invite being emailed on behalf of some user is suddenly worth getting angry and talking about international spam law. Especially when the exact same opt-out functionality exists. Click one button and never seen another email.. what's the deal here.

eof··on The New York Times Calls for Marijuana Legalization
> because they are addicted to marijuana. It definitely happens, don't kid yourself.

As a somewhat-in-denial marijuana addict that now recognizes the health impact it has had on me over 10+ years of regular use, and have seen lots of people placated by marijuana use I think you are assuming causation where there is only correlation. I'd consider myself somewhat high-functioning, but often wonder at where my mind and body would be today had I taken better care of myself (now that I'm in my 30s).

More to the point though:

> selling bottles of cheap vodka at the grocery store 24/7 is setting up a lot of people who are trying to get clean and recover their lives a lot more difficult.

If a well functioning government is thought of as a securely-running application, outlawing cheap vodka at grocery stores at 2am is like monkey patching. Allowing monkey-patching into production creates vectors for bugs. Allowing the state the outlaw victimless crimes is like allowing monkeyh patching in production.

If the problem is that there are people who are abusing themselves by drinking too much vodka: then using resources to find and help those who need it, and separating the ones who are causing harm to others from everyone else, is going to be a better long term solution.

While the idea of "lets just make it really hard for people to get vodka, then they will drink less.. problem solved!" is great, the reality is that sometimes people will go to great lengths to get their vodka anyway. You just created criminals out of the very people you were trying to help by legislating vodka distribution laws.

eof··on Poll: How religious is hacker news?
Other - Using standard nomenclature in a non-standard way I'd call myself a "Spiritual Atheist."

I had been an atheist of the "cold" variety: life spontaneously arose from non-life in an undefined fashion, and everything relevant to the conversation evolved from this first life.. only the "observable" could be real.

Seemingly non-local consciousness-connections (a dream where something bad happens to someone and they die that night, you think of someone in that moment they call you, esoteric initations into new-agey meditation [law of attraction, remove viewing], they way the universe seems to be inscrutably "nicer" to me the more buddha-like it is [e.g. when regularly meditating])

The reasons my metaphysics changed are nearly ineffable; and are certainly not objectively verifiable (at least by me). The ramifications are easy to grok:

- The universe is a holy playground - The universe has some sort of intention - The more your intentions fall in line with the intentions of the universe, the more satisfying life is.

There are also some non-obvious (but ultimately important) "actionable" ramifications: primarily that sometimes the best way to solve a corporeal problem is to get the spiritual aspect (ie, the interface between you and the universe) in line.

eof··on Show HN: Streisand – Silence censorship, automate the effect
(currently live) instruction example: http://jsbin.com/wutonaka/1/
eof··on Show HN: Streisand – Silence censorship, automate the effect
Dockerized "pre-reqs" for streisand:https://github.com/gdoteof/docker-streisand

so you can just do

    docker run -i -t streisand
eof··on Show HN: Streisand – Silence censorship, automate the effect
am now getting this, still on DO:

    TASK: [genesis-digitalocean | Get the latest 'Debian 7.0 x64' image ID from the DigitalOcean API] *** 
    fatal: [127.0.0.1] => a duplicate parameter was found in the argument string ()

    FATAL: all hosts have already failed -- aborting

    PLAY RECAP ******************************************************************** 
           to retry, use: --limit @/root/digitalocean.retry

    127.0.0.1                  : ok=4    changed=3    unreachable=1    failed=0
eof··on Show HN: Streisand – Silence censorship, automate the effect
I had to:

    sudo pip install markupsafe  
in a fresh ubuntu to get it going for DO
eof··on Show HN: Dead simple Bitcoin payroll
not everyone lives in the USA
eof··on Amazon Fire Phone
redirects to amazon.com for me.

edit: back up. 649 seems really steep.. especially with the "32GB for the same price as other 16GB smartphones" line

eof··on What will it take to get people using PGP for email?
well, you could keep a copy/index locally and just search through that..
eof··on Autodidact, front-end or back-end, job prospects?
You will be most employable as a full stack Linux Dev. Learn Linux, git, ruby/python/php/go and/or JavaScript. Make a couple personal projects, take a couple low paying contract gigs, and if you can actually ship code it won't be long till people are knocking on your door trying to hire you.

Becoming an expert in one of the more popular frameworks is probably the quickest paths to gainful employment.

eof··on Cryptocurrencies will create a fifth protocol layer
I'm sure sp332 meant having a centralized place to understand the intricacies of HN mechanics.
eof··on Cryptocurrencies will create a fifth protocol layer
> My router becomes profitable when I make its bandwidth scarce. The same incentive applies to everyone else with a router.

If you make your bandwidth scarce (and expensive) someone else with a router may be incentivized to make their bandwidth slightly cheaper; so you end up with zero profit (as you have no customers). This is the fundamental reason why market-based strategies are effective; you are competing with everyone else's router, not cooperating.

eof··on Show HN: Hash your work and store it in a bank transfer for priority statement
> The advantage of using bank transfers is it is much easier to explain to a judge/jury.

This seems like a really weak argument.. There are all types of things judges don't understand outright but can be made to be understood. The chance of a priority being granted to a hash embedded to a bank transfer and not a block-chain embedded one is essentially zero (all things being equal). Since it is both cheaper and more robust, a super-secure blockchain like bitcoin is clearly superior to a bank transfer.

eof··on DigitalOcean not destroying droplets securely, data is completely recoverable
The notion of having having 'secure' data on someone else's hardware is just a bit silly.

I think the OP here definitely points at something, but primarily that the `scrubbing` checkbox is essentially a placebo button.

Getting a little meta: a 'no matter what delete this in a fully 100% absolutely totally unrecoverable forever fashion' checkbox is just begging for a generic law enforcement ping which DO would be forced to provide covertly.

I appreciate OPs side, I definitely see DO's viewpoint of customer happiness >> accurate UI.. but the lesson here is definitely to own your own necessarily-secure data.

eof··on Stripe: Bitcoin Sign-up
if bitcoin weren't deflationary, it never would have been bootstrapped from zero. why would i buy a worthless bitcoin in 2010 if it was going to be worh the same or less in 20xx? This applies to all other cryptos as well; without central backing there is only supply/demand. No one wants to be the first to take a risk if there is no upside.
← PreviousPage 11 of 29Next →