2,332 karma · joined October 8, 2013
https://www.scottantipa.com
twitter.com/ScottyAntipa
scott@scottantipa.com
Its an html file I manually edit, deployed with netlify.
But I also agree with other commenters that culture is a huge part of this.
Its a general purpose DAG/flowchart editor completely optimized for keyboard shortcuts. No need to touch the mouse almost ever. Like excalidraw you can use a basic version immediately, no account. I recommend watching the 1min video and checking out the keyboard shortcuts menu because its a bit different from other flowchart editors.
1min tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPR0samb194
It would be interesting because as the paper says textual editing has great deployment and collaboration tooling. So if non textual could get a foothold in that exact area — git — it could draw a ton of people who just want to get things shipped.
And I also agree here to an extent, I just haven't found the right UX. Since the user can't control the layout (its done automatically) it can be confusing to write a new node in an empty cell but then have the layout algo immediately move that cell (based on its connections).
> show them the help popup
My goal is to make it usable without forcing the user to look at a tutorial. Otherwise it is too difficult. I agree its not there yet though. How did you figure it out? Did you use the Help icon or just click around to learn it?
> vim like keybindings
This would be cool, I just have to find the right user experience.
> sibling shortcut
Great idea, I hadn't thought of that.
> My use case is to think creatively
Could you give me an example? I use it for the same purpose, but typically I'm plotting events over time. For example right now I'm using it to manage the steps in a database migration at work. This may be quite different from your use case which sounds more like a hierarchical/mindmap kind of an exploration. How do you jump between nodes in Roam?
Thought 'demolish' was going in another direction there
Im not sure how valuable the logo addition is. Logos seem more personal. I think I would have paid < 100 for a very simple/generic logo and icon pack for knotend that just stood as a placeholder for later when I needed a real logo.
The website is really light on informatin. I would expect an api/integration provider to have things like code samples or UI examples, not to have to schedule a demo. Even having a little info graphic showing the steps needed to setup the integration (before needing to make an account) would go a long way.
My project is https://www.knotend.com if you have a sec, I have a top level comment here.
Looks like you need a login to try it, and I don't really have a need for image editing.
I'm not sure if users care or not that the system is built on machine learning models. Maybe a quick note if it here and there is good because it helps them understand that there's something 'smart' about it, but I wouldn't put sentences like this:
> built upon self-aware machine learning models
That just feels over the top and probably confusing to users.
Please see my top level comment for knotend.com and leave feedback.
I dont use discord. Do you mean you want a flowchart editor thats collaborative within your chat? Does discord have plugin ecosystem like that?