Obviously that's not good enough, but I'd much rather have AI tests than poor test coverage.
3,701 karma · joined July 31, 2019
Obviously that's not good enough, but I'd much rather have AI tests than poor test coverage.
A lot of apps seem like they could literally all use the same exact backend, if there was a service that just gave you the 20 or so features these kinds of things need.
Pocketbase is pretty close, but not all the way there yet, you still have to handle billing and security yourself, you're not just creating a client that has access to whatever resources the end user paid for and assigned to the app via the host's UI.
Right now, I'm experimenting with adding the ability to create DMX lighting effects plugins in WebAssembly, which I'm excited about.
https://github.com/EternityForest/KaithemAutomation/tree/mas...
Some of the substitutions wound up being a step down in features, or required rethinking parts of workflows, but the time savings is such a benefit.
Custom notetaking tool with p2p sync-> Google keep
Custom batteries included Linux distro for SD protection, Kiosk browsers, offline docs, creative commons content packs -> a few scripts built into my control server on vanilla RasPi OS
Rsync-> Borg -> Kopia(to avoid fussing with Borg's community NAS package)
I got rid of almost all the customized software in my life, and the few projects I decided to keep, I aggressively modernized, getting rid of thousands of lines of original code and adding many times more tests than I'd ever had before.
It very significantly improved my life and career to not have a second part time job maintaining a note taking app.
Could you take an AI 3D scan of someone's face, virtually lay a heavy cloth over it, then add whatever you wanted to make a mask?
Could you make the deformed cloth surface into one side of a cube, where the other side was flat for easily working with it, and use that to make custom pseudo-vacumformed cases for things?
Or just stack up boxes and simple shapes, and use the cloth simulation to build organic looking industrial design within a more traditional CAD workflow?
A mempool seems very much like a DIY implementation of malloc, unless you have fixed size allocations or something else that would make things different, not sure why I'd want that in the general case.
For "non hacker style" production code it just seems like a lot of extra steps.
I'm not sure how well it carries over to embedded platforms though, but I'm really interested in trying.
I suspect conda still has some market share too but I've never needed it.
Generally the only nontrivial scripting I ever do is associated with a larger project, so I often already have a pyproject.toml and a UV environment, and I just add the dependencies to the dev group.
I wonder if there's any similar communities focused on more typical modern dev practices? It seems like the interesting tech communities are often hacker ethos focused.
Year.version might be better for marketing though.
Solder likes to spit tiny balls everywhere. When cleaning the tip you can even wind up with a fairly fine dust. I do not want lead dust around.
I also often make heavy use of schema based editors to auto-generate UI.
Perhaps I'd feel differently if I ever had to write a validator myself, but they seem to exist in all the popular languages as is.
The CLI is amazing though!
A lot of the games themselves look like they'd actually be fun to play, which is pretty impressive for 4MHz, wasn't the GBC twice that?