I suppose you could detect some patterns, and it definitely wouldn't be clickable. But is the text google.com considered a URL for example? I guess it isn't?
(yeah I know, it's a stupid law anyway, but just wondering)
2,565 karma · joined August 15, 2007
I suppose you could detect some patterns, and it definitely wouldn't be clickable. But is the text google.com considered a URL for example? I guess it isn't?
(yeah I know, it's a stupid law anyway, but just wondering)
It would increase visibility for projects that don't want to use GitHub as a host for their code.
Most open source projects are completely dependent on Microsoft for their visibility.
> I see strong potential in this feature
Can you elaborate on what potential you're seeing? As a typical HN user (in my case a software engineer), I have difficulty imagining in which ways it could be useful (especially on a platform like Linux for example).This is an honest question, not criticism.
Changing the name of the party would help a great deal IMO
What I'm wondering is whether two separate applications can be set up to communicate automatically, with one handling messaging and the other being responsible for encrypting and decrypting the data.
What would be against the law in that case? The messaging app? The encryption app? Or the interaction you are doing in that moment?
> Data fetching and the N+1 problem
> [...] if a field resolver hits an external data source such as a DB or HTTP API, and
> it is nested in a list containing N items, it will do those calls N times
Why is this considered a problem regardless of the situation at hand?F.e. using REST, if the nested list contains on average N-2 items that can be efficiently cached, wouldn't that be better than having the cache constantly invalidated on the aggregation of the parent and its items?
What techniques are you referring to?
This is understandable but the integration of government, DNS, and particularly blocking is a controversial intersection of concepts.
Same here, I love his short stories!
IMO short form works better for him because there's so much to think about, even after having finished reading a story.
If someone needs a pointer on where to start I can recommend this thread: https://redlib.freedit.eu/r/printSF/comments/x1i4bj/greg_ega...
I especially enjoyed:
- The Safe-Deposit Box
- Into DarknessOberon: named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(moon)
Ada: named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace
Eiffel: named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustave_Eiffel
Sather: named afer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sather_Tower
Nim: named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrod
Erlang (Ericsson language): named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ericsson
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/104745.The_Art_of_UNIX_P...
https://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/
It has been a while since I read that book, but after skimming through clig.dev I gather opinions have changed over time quite a bit.