763 karma · joined March 22, 2017
For example, as a prospective employee, if I knew that I was the only qualified candidate the employer had interviewed, and they really needed someone within a week, I'd know that I can ask for more salary. If I instead take the middle of the salary range, just because it's maximally acceptable to both parties, I'd be missing out
- You have a strong unlock password that you don't use anywhere else
- You have a second factor set up for unlocking the vault (TPM in the device you're using, Yubikey, TOTP, etc.)
- The service you're logging into has good account recovery hygeine
The benefit, assuming those things, is that the passkey is phishing-resistant and social-engineering-resistant. If a user gets an email saying "omg, someone tried to transfer your paypal, click this link to log in", then when they try to log in with the passkey, the site the attacker is using won't be able to use the passkey (because the passkey is associated with a particular domain). Even if the user wanted to bypass this, there's specifically no way for them to extract the contents of the passkey.
That is very different from a user having their password stored in their vault. They could easily forget to check the domain, or get tricked by a very similar looking one, and copy/paste their password into the attacker's form.
I know this is just a start (and just enough to make the ROI worth it, probably), but it sounds particularly dystopian / late stage capitalism
For anyone who just wants to skip to the answer, I found it in the pull requests / issues: https://github.com/ClickHouse/adsb.exposed/issues/47
I would have thought that since that reflection has a different color in different directions, gaussian splat generation would have a hard time coming to a solution that satisfies all of the rays. Or at the very least, that a reflective surface would turn out muddy rather than properly reflective-looking.
Is there some clever trickery that's happening here, or am I misunderstanding something about gaussian splats?
>bUSD is not a stablecoin. It can never be redeemed for USD, and may trade at values other than $1 for extended periods of time.
Of all the places to try a gimmick, Vegas is the right place.
The question on page 14 is "Do you think the American Dream--that if you work hard you'll get ahead--still holds true, never held true, or once held true but does not anymore?
And the results are (from 2023 to 2025):
Still holds true: 36, 34, 31 (downward trend)
Never held true: 18, 17, 23 (upward trend)
Once held true but not anymore: 45, 49, 46 (mixed trend)
Suni and Butch have been on the ground since March, but the article mentions that "Stranded NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore have been living aboard the ISS for 170 days since their departure from Earth on June 5."
If all he wants is a refund, that should do it. But if he's more interested in warning the world, hopefully he sticks to his guns and makes them give a straight up refund
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_device_for_...
Cynically, you could use it for surveillance, similar to how they do face recognition or temperature scanning in airports.
The flip side of the coin is that it could be used for better authentication or medical purposes. Maybe your oxygen tank could realize you're breathing different than usual to warn you that you might be having a seizure, stroke, or heart attack. Or maybe we'd have "breathe to sign in" similar to FaceID
The author of this article even accidentally makes this omission:
> It’s 94 dB, roughly the loudness of a gas-powered lawnmower
And that distance is very important; the actual sound pressure measured is proportional to distance^2. So for a lawnmower measuring 94dB, let's say we assume that we're measuring at 1m. At 2m away, the sound is actually 91dB.
And don't get me started about the fact that a halving in power is 3dB, that's just wacky. I wish we used base 2.