511 karma · joined March 11, 2012
I should say you do get distortion where the cube faces meet at the edges. May or may not be a problem depending on how your texturing.
Nobody seems to have any idea what the issue is, but I've learned to manage it by controlling diet and stress basically. I'm still not 100% why/how it happens.
I've learned that these sorts of issues may be something science will never figure out for me since they focus on populations rather than the individual. I expect in 10 years some studies at some point will start isolating some of these triggers as they become more prevalent. I've talked with a few people who've had similar issues.
1. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/03/nvidias-new-ai-upsca...
And if you are doing data processing, easier to use a data science library like Pandas for Python which implicitly have DOD built-in.
Originally introduced for its particle system, the underlying system is a pure data-oriented framework that is supposed to be extremely fast.
https://docs.unrealengine.com/5.0/en-US/overview-of-mass-ent...
Someone like Pat Wyatt comes to mind:
In any case, he has experience in working on and shipping actual 3D game engine code.
The real issue is what was promised and teased and what was delivered. Honestly might border on false advertising. There are countless videos breaking down what was advertised in their promotional feature walkthrough videos and what was actually delivered (not even withstanding pretty glaring bugs and performance issues).
I don't think that's inherently wrong, just let's not ban people based on our own biases.
All of the intepretations of the events that happened yesterday could be equally uncharitably interpreted of BLM with the riots, violence, and protests across the country. I mean, they forcefully took over an entire city zone at one point.
Just so I won't be downvoted, I'm not a fan of Trump.
At an even deeper level, it ignores the deep motivations that drive people. Especially for people who are low in conscientiousness like myself, they need a deep existential reason for pursuing their goals. Merely setting up a goal I think I want and then working toward it isn't sufficient to drive me.
It has to be tied to a sense of meaningfulness toward my life (e.g. I'm not depressed or nihilistic), actively policing my negative self-talk, questioning my sense of paranoia or bad intentions in others, feelings of gratitude, etc.
I find if these drivers of my behavior/psychology are fixed, the other stuff just "snaps" into place.
I would say big companies that hire new people or generalist programmers benefit greatly from them. These types of questions test for intelligence at scale without outright being an IQ test. In fact, I think I read somewhere that Google engineers' performance is strongly correlated with how well they do on their interviews.
Sure, these questions might not test for conscientiousness, curiosity and general agreeableness, but that's why you have the other portions of the interview.
All this being said, I don't necessarily think these questions work at most companies where the engineering teams are significantly smaller and you can really spend a lot of 1-1 time probing knowledge and experience and reviewing coding exercises. However, I would still say basic DFS/BFS and using a hash to solve a problem is still a must. I use them on occasion, even as a generalist.
Only difference: Webstorm for JS and PyCharm for Python.
Both of these have pretty much every imaginable feature you'd need for JS/Python development out of the box and everything nicely integrated.
Were those critiques in the air at the time or was he just a nascent conservative?
I've read that SATs are heavily g-loaded.
In such a case, your success being correlated with the SAT is obvious, as IQ being positively correlated with income is well-accepted in psychometrics.
So yes, you can be successful without going to a good school, but mostly because you're relatively intelligent.