ewindal

They’re names, but like Bob, they’re not names that fit kids. Names are like fashion, they come in cycles. If your name is off-cycle, it’ll often sound a generation or two too far removed.

Oof, that list is terrible. Natan is listed twice, and there’s at least one name that isn’t a palindrome. The only two names that really work from that list is Anna and Hannah. Nobody should name their kid Bob in 2020, it’s not a «young» name yet. Thr older Bobs need to die off before it’s an acceptable kid’s name.

As for the rest of those names, I refuse to acknowledge them as names. They’re more like onomatopoeia.

No, corporate adopted it because it’s profitable right now.

Of course it can, but I believe the things men derive intrinsic satisfaction from are much more slow to change.

> they'll most likely suffer from down syndrome or other conditions

An order of magnitude higher chance of genetic defects isn’t very significant when the initial risk is less than .1%

Men are too dependent on women and work for validation for «society» to allow a broader expression of the male gender role. Those who can’t get fullfilment through their job won’t get it any easier, and I don’t see women’s tastes in men changing much.