That's kinda what we are paying them to be, no?
Google is just a for profit company.
774 karma · joined August 20, 2013
That's kinda what we are paying them to be, no?
Google is just a for profit company.
Speaking of reputation EFF has been doing this shady speak for last few years and my respect for them is quite diminished. I suppose they can still do it because they have practicality a monopoly to "protect privacy online" with Apple being a distant second player.
More reliability means slower development speed. If you are on the same ballpark as your competition, better invest in development speed than being 10x more reliable.
Anyhow this totally involves TJ and they will need to do something about it, as more customers will get pissed.
Lobbying lawmakers is a basic practice that happens all the time. And a law is not right on its own right, there is always supporters and detractors. Just that we agree as a society yo abide by the laws we currently have.
If anything we should invest in more public awareness to make sure strong privacy requirements are signed into the law.
On the other hand, strong privacy laws is a sizable buerocratic burden on the society. So we should be cautious to not over regulate. Laws are difficult to change or revoke even if they are found ineffective or too stringent later on.
A high trust environment where most of the players do the right thing without the buerocracy and enforcement is way more efficient.
There are a ton of other ways to get a gun illegally, this is just the cheapest and least reliable one. Without knowing the denominator, the numbers are useless. Also very much doubt that the traceability of legal guns is that useful.
The duty can be a flat rate or an average emissions per economic output for the country.
Turns out releasing hydrogen in the atmosphere has some greenhouse effects: http://www.ghgonline.org/otherhydrogen.htm
Public indexes is just the surface of the iceberg. And regulating them down would just be more profit for the pay-to-play.
Edit: Switzerland has a different approach where children are segregated by their ability starting from 7th school year. So you go to Gymnasium, A level, B level, C level.
That said: - way cheaper - more reliable - less power hungry - simpler and easier to debug.
Once DDG is big enough, they will be forced to do the same.
IMO this is a somewhat grey area. Not familiar with regulations around testing labs, but om the surface looks like an innocent cost optimization that someone decided to put some pressure on.
The truth is humans are wired to gauge the level of environmental danger by looking for personably relatable aggression events. And there is a practical limit how low we should go. Also with living more dense, humans are gotten way better at handling various aggressive stimuli, like noise, air pollution, constant close interaction. We have stopped treating them as aggression, but it still is for the rest of life on this rock.
At times of stress we seek out the enemy. And external imaginary enemy is always easier to accept than internal or god forbid a bad habit that we are all guilty of.