Framing this as a general rejection of APIs because they are from OpenBSD is highly disingenuous.
2,084 karma · joined September 14, 2012
Framing this as a general rejection of APIs because they are from OpenBSD is highly disingenuous.
* John Wiegley, author of eshell and other things. * The ada-mode was moved to GNU elpa because the maintainer didn't want to work with bzr.
The thesis was nicely typeset in LaTeX and it would have been ridiculous to make the cover look far worse than the actual text.
The engraving was supposed to be something like 3€ per line. But it didn't even support basic typographic features because of Word. That was just ridiculous. That's why my thesis has a plain cover and the shop lost 12€ (- expenses) per copy.
But anyway: bzr has simply become a barrier. Not only to attract new developers but also some long term contributors have ceased contributions because they considered bzr to be too much of a hassle. But it's not only that git has simply become the vcs everybody knows. Bazaar development has stopped and it's in "maintenance mode", which sadly means that some bugs aren't getting fixed. Switching to git therefore made sense from several perspectives.
It's from an early version though (over a year old)
The HTML rendering engine (shr) was originally written as part of the Gnus project for exactly that task: To render HTML in RSS and email. The browser (eww) just adds http support via url.el and a user front end.
I have played it but I'm not really a Minecraft person myself. However as far as I know the modding situation isn't that bad because the Minecraft jar can be easily decompiled. The problem is only the lack of a stable API (which seems to be in development though) which means updates can break mods and other mods can break mods. There also doesn't seem to be an official loader or mod list. Thus people are forced to deal with obscure websites and obscure mod makers.
Mojang is not putting any artificial hurdles in the way of modding. Something which I highly doubt would have ever been possible if it had been a Microsoft company.
There is no way Microsoft will let it run like that. They bought it because they have plans for it and those plans will likely collide with the interests of the community. Microsoft is big in the gaming console business and struggling in the mobile market. It seems likely that they'll try to use Minecraft to push those markets.
Even if they won't do it immediately I suspect that they'll eventually make Minecraft exclusive to Xbox and mobile. Meanwhile they'll drop or decrease support for systems they don't like, like GNU/Linux, Playstations, etc. Maybe this will be part of a rewrite or a new huge upgrade (which I guess we can call "Downloadable Content" or whatever it is called in the XBox universe from now on).
And Microsoft will put their game guys in charge of it. And those guys speak a different language than Mojang. They don't care about indie and close community. They care about downloadable content and making new sellable releases every 12-24 month.
ktime_t dtrace_gethrtime(void) { return ktime_get(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dtrace_gethrtime);
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/31357.html
In the end I assume this is intentional to keep the license issue of dtrace and ZFS in a dubious state. Thus preventing other distributions from shipping it. Meanwhile Oracle can ship it because they aren't going to sue themselves and the kernel folks seem rather uninterested in lawsuits as well (and even if they did then Oracle could drag it out forever considering that the company seems to have more lawyers than developers).
That's why many people are opposed to them.
I guess one can't thank you enough for saving the web from VBScript!
The big issue for me though is Twitter. It does not support 2FA with FreeOTP (or the proprietary Google Authenticator). I don't want to install the Twitter App or hand over my phone number for privacy reasons.
If you want to block specific websites or specific content then you obviously need to use a different tool as well.
There is no UI in Firefox because Firefox uses the operating systems parental control features to enable/disable it. And those features should have a UI within the system. That's why it is only implemented for OS X and Windows at the moment.