One annoying thing is that current versions of Firefox seem to rely on disk I/O too much, so if it's busy, you can't really do anything (switching or creating new tabs is greeted by spinning loading circle that takes a long time to happen).
343 karma · joined June 18, 2017
One annoying thing is that current versions of Firefox seem to rely on disk I/O too much, so if it's busy, you can't really do anything (switching or creating new tabs is greeted by spinning loading circle that takes a long time to happen).
Other than that, most should be safe ig.
One annoying thing is that the page name is misleading. apt does use/support https, it's just that Debian chooses for its default mirrors to it be optional.
i.e. Firefox Developer had its own profile, but Nightly and Firefox shared the same, which was a PITA for the latter case.
Now all editions (thankfully) will have their own respective folders.
In that case, having the app run the background really does seem like a waste when compared to leaving the OS to do this task.
Regardless, the website should probably capture the keys instead of letting that happen, I'm not well-versed in JS DOM events enough to know exactly what has to be changed, but, IIRC the callback function needs to return false.
External modules (on the fs) wont, but we're talking about the bundled ones, right?
I question the utility of having this delay behaviour by default, worst that can happen is you accidentally start a download AFAIK, which you can just quickly delete/cancel afterwards.
And, there's browser.download.manager.alertOnEXEOpen too.
I much prefer Chrome's behaviour of starting the download and you instantly can see the filename and size in the bottom as soon as it starts and can then choose to either open it or show it in the file manager.
Imagine taxes specific to laundering machines that only apply when washing underwear, but not for any other clothes, it makes no sense.
Also, the govt. snooping on what people access / banning use of VPNs raises privacy concerns (and even censorship ones).
I've been wondering about how much instructions cost lately and would like to be able to know this without the need of asking others.
Yet the article's title makes it seems like it was the OS implementors faults instead of Intel's.
I wonder for what reasons the website tries to shift/soften Intel's fault on this?
Seems like there's a trend in news articles to have incoherent titles in relation to content lately, it's really annoying...
Why?
If you meant lack of default browser preinstalled though, I agree with you its lacking.
It's necessary to change the network card in VirtualBox for internet connection to work IIRC.
A (hacky?) fix would be `overflow-x: scroll` I guess.
The post title is incorrect, ACAT has been open-sourced quite some time ago. August 14, 2015[0] is the oldest source I could find within a quick Google Search.
[0] = https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/cdndevs/2015/08/14/intel-ju...