Edit: typo (thanks)
336 karma · joined December 19, 2016
Edit: typo (thanks)
In general you're right as in: most often in the first few result pages, there is no hit of sites you prefer. I think an extension that lists the most popular pages that have user-agency to the top can already help without curated blocklists: rank wikipedia, stackoverflow sites, github and reddit to the top.
There was a Show HN for "hypersearch" in 2022 that did something similar but in a sidebar - https://github.com/abhinavsharma/hypersearch
Degoogling is not deblobbing and Lineage or /e/ use plenty of closed source software during runtime. The top parent and DivestOS author really is deblobbing* to some degree, but forks of LineageOS that introduce measures of "degoogling" hold onto vendor firmware blobs on androids /vendor partition for functionality. Those aren't known for connecting to the Google hivemind though.
* https://github.com/Divested-Mobile/DivestOS-Build/blob/de3ba...
My interpretation of the term degoogling fits the second part of your sentence, "getting away from online services": it is user agency in what network connections can occur, so either by default or optionally users can stop any signaling coming from the device they use. They don't have that freedom with the software the device came with.
Here some more screenshots for the uninitiated (with search used on GIMP in the first two screenshots): https://imgur.com/a/5XlgTO3
And the official docs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/HUD
If Firefox did extend the Profile Manager to allow for this kind of personalisation and OS integration (profiles showing up as their own, customizeable launcher icon), that'd be another win.
Firefox has useful about:about pages.
With some revamp they could capitalize on some of them much more. After newtab, the last addition was "Firefox View" for recently closed tabs or synced tabs. I'd wish the same for history, bookmarks and downloads. Those very much show their origin as sqlite browser.
You'll collect low effort comments, but at least it avoids duplicates and the discussion is preserved in-thread.
That impression lead me to meaningfully contribute in the bugtracker.
- highlighting for used Paragraph and Character styles - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Styles_highlighter_...
I'm using these alot, very welcome
Their dedicated blog keeps you posted if firefox perf is your interest https://blog.mozilla.org/performance/
If you have a particular website you notice chromium being significantly faster with, for an easy report, there's https://webcompat.com/ - though bugzilla is better than it seems when coming from github issues
browser.urlbar.maxRichResults 22
browser.urlbar.quicksuggest.migrationVersion 2
browser.urlbar.quicksuggest.scenario history
browser.urlbar.showSearchSuggestionsFirst false
browser.urlbar.suggest.bestmatch false
browser.urlbar.suggest.remotetab false
browser.urlbar.suggest.topsites false
browser.urlbar.suggest.weather false
browser.urlbar.tabToSearch.onboard.interactionsLeft 0
browser.urlbar.tipShownCount.searchTip_onboard 4
browser.urlbar.speculativeConnect.enabled false
browser.urlbar.shortcuts.quickactions true
the code and sql that determines the behaviour for this is athttps://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/compone... https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/compone...
I get a lot out of this
You still need scribus in the loop to get to cmyk, it's not a seamless workflow yet.
To clean up path tracings from surplus edges, a changed "node deletion logic" is also welcome.
I'm sorry for the packaging waste though.
I had the 2-line message header view on my wishlist for a long time. Thunderbird did pretty great.
A study[1] by wikipedia done with DDG notes it showed up in the top5 results and information module for ~13% of searches with a click-through rate for each at ~8% - so a total of ~16% click-through rate. Granted, that is not a number gained from title searches but the whole articles.
[1]: https://diff.wikimedia.org/2021/09/23/searching-for-wikipedi...
My only worry is a tragedy of the commons scenario.
Some ui-breakpoints for a mobile view on tables are missing and not yet catalogued in the issue tracker. Use-case: string searching a table on the go.
Mirrors publish the fingerprints, but it's unclear what verification they applied. Looking at history won't cover revocation, but it's already something. Certificate transparency logs could handle apks instead of domains too.
I understand the appeal of Aurora and similar - you let Google handle search, malware takedown and download traffic, but then you're also up to be cut off at no notice.