flimflamm

Surely you can have the same LLM review the code. But treat output of that process similar to linters.

That one tool (LLM) didn't show issues - good. Then lets roll slaves back and start really checking if the meaning is correct and is the code implementing the right things the right way.

Can't CTRL-Scroll to zoom to the generated image which is with so small text that I can't read it.

It would be interesting to see how far one could get with fine tuning and RL. One could for example take free scad models, give 2D pictures from different angles and ask LLM to recreate the 3D design in scad language. Then compare volumetrically how close they are and provide feedback.

Once that is done then ask LLM to create a prompt and compare outputs etc..

Seems like there are some inaccuracies when zooming in. I don't think that Mandelbrot contains this kind of smooth features https://mandelbrot.site/?re=-0.11582128424197435&im=-0.88580...

Not illegal in Finland at least.

Imagine your eye's effective integration time (the period over which it "samples" light) shrinks during a rapid saccade—say down to about 5–10 ms. Under steady conditions, our flicker fusion threshold is around 60 Hz, but that’s because our retina integrates over a longer window.

If we want to “smooth out” the PWM cycles so we don’t see discrete pulses, we need a few cycles (say, 3–5) within that 5–10 ms window. In other words:

    For a 10 ms integration window:
        3 cycles → f≥30.01 s=300 Hzf≥0.01s3 =300Hz
        5 cycles → f≥50.01 s=500 Hzf≥0.01s5 =500Hz
    For a 5 ms window:
        3 cycles → f≥30.005 s=600 Hzf≥0.005s3 =600Hz
        5 cycles → f≥50.005 s=1000 Hzf≥0.005s5 =1000Hz

So, to cover worst-case scenarios (rapid eye movement, bright conditions where the eye’s temporal resolution is higher), the PWM systems for LED lights should be rather in the ballpark of 300–1000 Hz than 200 Hz. Given that one would be viewing headlights some 2 meters away (impacts the what is the view angle change and speed).

And yes, what we are now seeing in cars is super annoying. Similar disregardful to user comfort can be seen with HUD displays (at least with Volvo).

Paper also here https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.13731

"That's not how it's described" - Thanks for the correction!

To create a patch, a small model is used to predict the likelihood for the next character in the input string. Input string: 'Lazy dog jumped over a fence.' Use the model to predict the likelihood of each character.

For example:

    100% sure the next character is 'a'.
    Or maybe it's 10% sure it's 'a', 10% sure it's 'b', and so on.

Then we chunk character estimates together. How many characters? Enough characters so that the total uncertainty (entropy) in each chunk is about the same. And there you have your 'patch' (or 'token').

How is different user account usage and partial similar answer preventing an answer being hallucinated? Are you saying that ChatGPT could not (or LLMs in genera) hallucinate consistently?

Yeah I know it runs. But it also hallucinated a Shell: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/ziukmm/i_asked_it_...

Why everything you see isn't just hallucinated?

That's just meat CoT (chain of thought) - right?

Thanks for the writeup! It was great as you explained the tools and rabbit holes you went it to.

How would the authors consider a paralyzed individual who can only move their eyes since birth? That person can learn the same concepts as other humans and communicate as richly (using only their eyes) as other humans. Clearly, the paper is viewing the problem very narrowly.

Why are you shouting?

Seems not be able to use other languages than English. "I apologize, but I cannot fulfill your request as I'm just an AI and do not have the ability to write in Finnish or any other language. "

Organ donation will

Or then it hallucinates that. You would not know...

Cool graphics with oscilloscope. Hacking at it's finest.

I want an unproductivity blocker

Depends. Usually yes. Also wallet return rates are high / Finland.

Yes

Finnish pirate party https://www.piraattipuolue.fi/

Sorry, I am out side of US. What's the difference?

Should police collect iPhones away in those cities where face recognition is banned?

I wonder how much energy this consumes compared to traditional wood equivalents?

" Are all "inventions" made using windows now also partially created/owned by Microsoft? "

I suppose that depends on what crafty Microsoft lawyers have written to the contracts. I would assume no. It's a tool which is in the possession of the person who bought the license from Microsoft.

How can children be poor? Aren't their parents poor? Or are children supposed to provide for them selves in US?

Yes.